Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Monika Narang v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against a GST demand order despite pending challenges to the notification's validity before the Supreme Court, refraining from interfering under writ jurisdiction.
Sanjay Narang v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the underlying GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Monika Narang v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to the Supreme Court.
Sumit Enterprises v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order for denial of personal hearing due to inadequate notice on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.
Korea Marine Transport Co Ltd v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato, Ward 204 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to denial of effective notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
A S International v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 61
Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order for lack of personal hearing and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of related GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Sumit Enterprises v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 63
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Jai Industries v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an order passed without considering the petitioner’s reply and directed fresh adjudication with a personal hearing, while leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
TC Components India Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Delhi North
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with GST adjudication orders pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications, allowing the petitioner to file appeals with prescribed pre-deposit.
M/S. MOHAN INTERNATIONAL v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court restored the petitioner's GST appeal dismissed on limitation grounds, directing adjudication on merits while leaving the validity of impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Delhi Chromewell v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST notifications and orders, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal while leaving the validity of the notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Balaji Sales v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST Show Cause Notice and related notifications for concealment of facts and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies pending Supreme Court adjudication on the notifications' validity.
Vicky Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court remanded the GST adjudication to afford the petitioner a personal hearing and left open the validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court's decision.
Neelgiri Poly Plast v. Commissioner Delhi Goods and Service Tax and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without personal hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S OAK SHIPPING SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. Union of India
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand order for failure to afford hearing, permitting petitioner to file reply and be heard, while leaving validity of impugned GST notifications to Supreme Court.
Anmol Purse and Wallet v. Govt of NCT of Delhi through Chief Secretary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a tax adjudication order for procedural irregularities and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Govind Aggarwal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the impugned GST demand order while permitting the petitioner to file an appeal without limitation bar pending the Supreme Court’s decision on the validity of the challenged notification.
Go Auto Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper service of notice via an inaccessible portal tab, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of the extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M/S Kessels Engineering Works Pvt Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order due to non-downloadable Show Cause Notice, directing fresh notice and hearing while leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
R L ENTERPRISES v. COMMISSIONER OF STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DELHI
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication order and granted petitioner opportunity to file reply and be heard, leaving validity of extension notification under Section 168A CGST Act pending before Supreme Court.