Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 09.05.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, W.P.(CRL) 402/2025
SH. FARMAN & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through: Mr. M.C. Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.A. Niyazi, Ms. Anamika Ghai Niyazi, Ms. Kirti Sethi &
Mr. Arquam Alia, Advs. Petitioners in person.
Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC and Mr. Alok Sharma
Shudhanshu, PS Kalyanpuri Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. for
R-2 along
JUDGMENT
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
1. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 0013/2025, dated 02.01.2025, registered at P.S Kalyanpuri under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties.
2. On 01.01.2025, a quarrel took place between the Petitioners and the Respondent No.2 whereby the Respondent No.2 sustained minor injuries. Thereafter, Respondent No.2 lodged the aforesaid FIR NO. 0013/2025 against Petitioners. The complainant Imran lodged cross FIR No. 0014/2025 under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 at PS Kalyanpuri against the Respondent No.2.
3. During the proceedings, the parties have amicably resolved their disputes with the intervention close friends and executed a Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 17.01.2025. In pursuance of the Settlement, it is submitted that the parties will cooperate and join the proceedings of quashing of the aforesaid FIR and will not file any other complaint against each other. The copy of Compromise/Settlement Deed dated 17.01.2025 has been placed on record as Annexure P-3.
4. The matter was placed before the Joint Registrar, who has recorded the statements of both the parties and passed the following orders:- “01.05.2025 Today, videoconferencing is not connected due to some technical error. Complaint in this regard made to the concerned branch. Today, statement of respondent no.2 and 10 have been recorded to ascertain the veracity and the genuineness of the parties entering into settlement. Respondent no.2 has been identified by the counsel and IO. Let the pre-verified statement along with this order be placed before the Hon'ble Court on 09th May, 2025.
5. Petitioners and respondent no. 2 are physically present before the Court. They have been identified by their respective counsels as well as by the Investigating Officer SI Shudhanshu, from PS Kalyanpuri.
6. Respondent No.2 submits that the matter has been settled with the Petitioners without any force, fear, coercion and he has no objection if the FIR No. 0013/2025 is quashed against the Petitioners.
7. In view of the settlement between the parties, learned Additional PP appearing for the State, also has no objection if the present FIR No. 0013/2025 is quashed.
8. In Gian Singh vs State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303, Hon’ble Supreme Court has recognized the need of amicable resolution of disputes by observing as under:-
9. In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the fact that parties have put a quietus to the dispute, no useful purpose will be served in continuing with the present FIR No. 0013/2025, dated 02.01.2025, registered at P.S Kalyanpuri under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom.
10. In the interest of justice, the petition is allowed and FIR NO. 0013/2025, dated 02.01.2025, registered at P.S Kalyanpuri under sections 118(1)/3(5) BNS, 2023 and all the other consequential proceeding emanating therefrom is hereby quashed, subject to deposit of cost of Rs. 5000/- by each petitioner with the Delhi High Court Advocate Welfare Trust, within 15 days from today.
11. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J MAY 09, 2025