Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Raghuvir Prasad Jain Proprietor Raghuvir Prasad Jain and Sons v. Commissioner of DGST
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST demand orders based on disputed notifications, directing adjudication of the statutory appeal and leaving the validity of the notifications to the Supreme Court's decision.
Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed without proper notice and hearing due to defective service via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M/S CHANDGI RAM AND SONS v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS
Delhi High Court set aside appellate order rejecting GST appeal for delay and restored it for merits hearing, leaving validity of extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
Kolbros v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court restored the petitioner’s appeal against a GST demand order and allowed adjudication on merits without limitation bar, pending the Supreme Court’s decision on the validity of the impugned notification extending limitation periods under Section 168A of the GST Act.
M/S. BALAJI ENGINEERING WORKS v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to improper notice via the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of time-extension notifications pending Supreme Court review.
Monu & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 324/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.
Dinesh Dalal & Anr. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine settlement between estranged spouses, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes upon amicable compromise.
Mayank & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under the BNS, 2023 based on a genuine compromise between parties, applying the principles from Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.
Sarthak Jain & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Kuldeep Mourya and Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing that continuing criminal proceedings would be futile and against public interest.
Saurav Beverages Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside GST demand orders passed ex-parte due to defective notice via portal, remanding for fresh adjudication with proper hearing, while leaving validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court ruling.
Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST assessment order for lack of proper hearing and consideration, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court review.
Mahavir Ispat Udyog v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Service Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking GST demand order for lack of personal hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Indus Environmental Services Pvt Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court set aside ex parte GST demand order for lack of natural justice and remanded for fresh adjudication, leaving validity of impugned notifications to Supreme Court.
Garg Agency v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order and granted the petitioner another opportunity to be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Aradhna Bags v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of effective notice and hearing, while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A of the GST Act open pending Supreme Court decision.
R K Plastic v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST adjudication order and remanded for fresh hearing after petitioner failed to avail opportunity, while leaving validity of impugned notifications to Supreme Court.
Saad Minhaj v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/AVATO
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST adjudication order for violating natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of impugned GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Luxmi Jewellers v. Commissioner of DGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic GST adjudication order, allowing the petitioner to file a fresh reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.