Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Square Vision India Pvt Ltd v. PCIT-7, Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of a one-day delay in filing income tax return due to genuine hardship caused by technical difficulties, setting aside the tax authority's rejection on grounds of limitation and absence of hardship.
M/S CONTRUCTION INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL v. M/S MCM WORLDWIDE PRIVATE LIMIED & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that the respondent's claim was barred by limitation under Article 18 of the Limitation Act, and a post-limitation acknowledgment letter could not extend the limitation period, rendering the dispute non-arbitrable and allowing the appeal.
Union of India and Another v. Hemant Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's stay on suspension as infructuous after the underlying Original Application was withdrawn and dismissed.
Delhi Jal Board v. SH O P Gaud
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order reinstating an employee dismissed for alleged forgery of caste certificate, holding that the criminal case closure and judicial finding of genuineness negated the departmental inquiry's basis.
Arvind Sagar v. Kavita @ Seema
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking recall of an ex-parte maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.P.C., holding that insufficient medical evidence and deliberate non-appearance do not justify setting aside such orders.
Ashok Kumar Gupta v. Suresh Chand Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal seeking modification of a consent decree for joint sale of property, holding that legal heirs cannot reopen such decree on inter se disputes.
Staff Selection Commission & Anr. v. Khabbab
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination where specialist opinion was not adequately considered in declaring a candidate unfit for police recruitment.
Union of India v. Bhadar Sain Chandolia
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting the 3rd MACP benefit to employees by counting their past service from initial appointment despite re-appointment by absorption.
Chaman Lal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondents to treat it as a representation, decide it promptly, and keep any adverse decision in abeyance for one week to allow the petitioner to seek legal remedies.
Eureka Forbes Limited v. Nandan Sales and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Eureka Forbes against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off involving counterfeit water purifier products, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants’ non-appearance.
Sombir v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition seeking mandamus for consideration of a representation already decided, granting liberty to file a proper petition challenging the decision.
Balwan Singh v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation against his transfer within four weeks, ensuring procedural fairness without immediate quashing of the transfer order.
M/S Nikon Finlease Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -04, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay under Section 119(2)(b) for filing a revised income tax return to rectify a clerical error, holding that such errors not affecting income assessment warrant leniency.
Arun Navariya v. Sh. Naresh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the rejection of an application to dismiss an Election Petition, allowing the petitioner to argue all objections at trial while directing no adjournments for expeditious disposal.
Nutan Goyal & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against petitioners under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act, holding that mere shareholding or directorship in a related company does not impose liability unless the person was in charge of and responsible for the company’s business at the time of the offence.
Anil Dutt Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a complaint against police officials for improper investigation due to absence of prior sanction under Section 197 CrPC, affirming the mandatory protection for public servants acting in official capacity.
Gurpal Kaur v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Sections 498A and 417 IPC but declined to frame charges under Sections 406, 468, 471, and 420 IPC, emphasizing territorial jurisdiction and the necessity of entrustment for criminal breach of trust.
Dheeraj Arora v. Pariney Khanna
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging jurisdiction and maintainability of a domestic violence complaint, affirming that the court had territorial jurisdiction based on the aggrieved person's residence under Section 27 of the DV Act despite the exclusion of Jammu and Kashmir under Section 1(2).
Om Prakash Kaith Since Deceased Through LRS. and Anr. v. Chetan Handa & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC as the impugned interlocutory order did not finally dispose of the suit and thus was not amenable to revision.
Garg Candle Works v. Commissioner, Delhi GST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration is impermissible where the petitioner had already applied for cancellation, setting the effective cancellation date as the date of the show cause notice.