Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Faizal Khan v. Mohd Nadeem & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant cannot challenge a decree in execution proceedings or withhold possession on grounds of non-refund of security deposit, affirming that execution courts cannot entertain collateral attacks on valid decrees.
Narender Kumar Wadhwa v. S Karan Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of an appeal for delay, holding that sufficient cause was shown for condonation of a 20-day delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and remanded the matter for merits hearing.
Chahna Gupta v. Priyanka Arukiya & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's appeal directing eviction of the respondent from a self-acquired property, holding that the DV Act does not bar eviction of a licensee from a non-shared household and that judgment on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is appropriate where ownership is admitted.
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Abdulkhaliq Abdulkader Chamadia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declared the 'LV' mark as a well-known trade mark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, affirming the plaintiff's exclusive rights and entitlement to protection against infringement.
Mr. Prem Arora v. Sonia Kanwar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaintiff's suit for declaration and possession of property due to suppression of prior litigation, non-disclosure of material facts, and invalidity of title based on unregistered documents, holding the suit barred and the plaintiff not a bona fide purchaser.
G4S Facility Services India Pvt Ltd v. Chet Ram
The Delhi High Court held that only the Controlling Authority appointed by the Central Government has jurisdiction over gratuity claims for establishments with branches in multiple states, setting aside the State Government's order passed without jurisdiction.
Kalkajee Kraft Paper Private Limited v. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that service of income tax notices to the email address registered with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs is valid and participation in proceedings precludes objections to service, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the assessment and penalty orders.
Bharat Kumar Gupta v. Sanjay Kumar
The High Court upheld the trial court's conditional grant of leave to defend a cheque bounce suit under Order XXXVII CPC, emphasizing limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC and the necessity of deposit to balance interests where triable issues exist.
Surender Singh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted a police constable charged under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, holding that the prosecution failed to prove acceptance or attempt to accept bribe beyond reasonable doubt.
Puri v. Mohd Farid & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal of accused in a grievous hurt case, holding that minor contradictions do not vitiate consistent witness testimony corroborated by medical evidence, and convicted the accused while granting probation.
Prabhakiran Jain v. M/S S. R. Jewels Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a mediated settlement subsumes the original complaint under Section 138 NI Act, and breach of such settlement cannot be prosecuted through a fresh complaint but must be enforced through execution or contempt proceedings.
MS MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. ALETHIA INFOTEL PRIVATE LIMITED
The Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that judicial scrutiny at this stage is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and not merits of the dispute.
M/S Sheetal and Sons v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging GST demand orders for fraudulent ITC, holding that statutory appellate remedy under Section 107 must be availed before approaching the High Court under Article 226.
Directorate of Revenue Intelligence v. Khushant Nagpal
The Delhi High Court upheld bail granted to a youthful accused involved as a minor participant in gold smuggling, dismissing the petition seeking recall on grounds of investigation pendency and offence gravity.
Rajendra Kumar Sahu v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted leave to withdraw a writ petition to enable filing of a fresh petition with additional details and disposed of the original petition as withdrawn.
Ramchander v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that after setting aside an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, the remedy lies within the arbitration regime and not through a writ petition under Article 226, dismissing the appellant's claim for refund via writ jurisdiction.
Rajeev Seth v. State of Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that deletion of a party from a suit at the petitioner's risk is valid, but procedural fairness requires applications to be listed and parties heard before orders are passed, setting aside an order passed without hearing.
M/S DOLLAR INDUSTRIES LTD. v. VARISH AGGARWAL
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal permitting the distributor to dispose of unsold stock pending trial, as the manufacturer refused to take back goods or issue credit notes, leaving substantive disputes for trial.
Banson Enterprises & Anr. v. Assistant Commissioner CGST & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST order involving fraudulent ITC claims, directing the petitioner to pursue statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
Sharma v. KM Lavi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-review medical examination for a police constable candidate declared unfit due to fungal infection, emphasizing the need for a conclusive medical opinion on fitness relative to job duties.