Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nipun Kataria & Ors. v. State Through SHO P.S. Naraina & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a domestic violence FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following a voluntary settlement and mutual consent divorce, emphasizing the Court's power to promote peace through quashing criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes.
Danish Ahmad & Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage by Mubaraat/Khula, emphasizing the court's discretion to prevent futile litigation.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajan Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that siblings can be dependents of a bachelor deceased if credible evidence of financial dependency exists, modified the compensation award by excluding loss of love and affection, and upheld the rest of the award.
Varsha Aggarwal v. Maya Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order dismissing the petitioner's application to strike out a suit for permanent injunction by the property owner against a licensee, clarifying the law on injunction suits where possession and title are undisputed.
Mohd. Saied v. Iqbal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that an order under Order XXII Rule 3 CPC adding legal representatives is interlocutory and not revisable under Section 115 CPC, dismissing the petition and directing remedy under Article 227 of the Constitution.
M/S FULLERTION INDIA CREDIT CO. LTD. v. M/S CREDIT MICROFINANCE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court ordered dissolution of M/s Credible Microfinance Limited under Section 481 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to lack of assets and non-cooperation by ex-directors, permitting the Official Liquidator to close accounts and transfer remaining funds.
Harshvardhan Chemicals and Minerals Ltd and Anr v. UOI
The Delhi High Court held that indefinite debarment pending prolonged criminal proceedings violates natural justice and proportionality, setting aside the impugned order of blacklisting petitioner No.1.
M/SSINGH CATERERS AND VENDORS v. INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LIMITED
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitrator’s order imposing a Rs. 2.5 crore deposit as security, holding it arbitrary and unsupported by proper sales data or legal principles under CPC Order XXXVIII Rule 5.
Shri Hari Om Prakash Gupta v. ACIT Central Circle-28, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that reopening assessment under Section 153C beyond the six-year block period from the date of satisfaction is invalid, setting aside the notice and assessment for AY 2016-17.
Peeyush Jain v. Ghasi Ram Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the Trial Court’s refusal to allow further cross-examination, holding that the Trial Court acted within its discretion to ensure expeditious disposal and that the High Court would not interfere under its supervisory jurisdiction absent manifest illegality.
Ashok Bulchand Mulchandani HUF v. M/S Moondrops Overseas Services LLP & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a decree against an LLP cannot be executed against its designated partner unless the decree is specifically against the partner, dismissing the appeal seeking attachment against the designated partner.
Ballarpur Industries Limited v. SG Enterprises & Ors.
The Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of a unilaterally appointed sole arbitrator during insolvency moratorium, holding such appointment invalid under the Arbitration Act and IBC.
J.K. Parashar v. Bhagat Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of the petitioner’s application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that insufficient court fees and non-inclusion of declaration relief do not warrant rejection of the plaint without opportunity to amend.
Khaleeque Ahmed v. Superintendent CGST, Range -163, Ward- 94, Zone 8
The Delhi High Court directed the GST Department to ensure proper communication and timely uploading of notices and orders, restraining coercive action pending compliance with procedural safeguards under GST law.
Devki Devi & Anr. v. Sagir & Ors.
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the motor accident claim appeal, enhancing compensation by recognizing higher income, awarding medical expenses, loss of consortium to the son, increased future prospects, and higher interest rate.
Mohd. Asif v. Ranbir Singh & Anr.
Delhi High Court partly allowed motor accident claim appeal, directing enhanced compensation for 80% disability, updated income, future medical expenses, attendant charges, and non-pecuniary damages.
M/S ICON FIBRES FABRICS PVT LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, DELHI
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring it for fresh adjudication on merits, holding that the appellant was not heard by CESTAT and affirming the Supreme Court's ruling that DRI officers are proper officers under the Customs Act.
G Veerabahu v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the appellant lacked locus standi to challenge the vigilance clearance and retirement benefits granted to a former CVO, and that the administrative guidelines did not mandate mandatory vigilance clearance before release of retirement benefits.
Ravinder Kumar & Anr. v. Raj Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed the mutually agreed arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from the Agreement for Sale dated 20.02.2011.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex WO Mani Lal Prasad
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II and Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection absent contrary proof and limiting writ interference to errors of law.