Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shyam Singh v. HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co. Ltd.
The High Court held that functional disability must be assessed considering occupational impact and remanded the case for enhanced compensation based on 50% functional disability instead of 39%.
Chandresh Jain v. Ghasi Ram Jain
The High Court set aside the trial court's order closing the petitioner's right to lead evidence and granted a final opportunity to examine the petitioner, emphasizing procedural fairness under Article 227.
Aviraj Pandey v. Ajay
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order directing the petitioners to reconsider the respondent's candidature after failing to provide him the mandated opportunity to submit the photocopy of his EWS certificate.
DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION BOARD v. PARVESH GAUTAM
The Delhi High Court upheld that registration with the statutory Council is mandatory for appointment as Occupational Therapist, invalidating the appointment of an unregistered candidate and directing appointment of the eligible candidate even by creating a supernumerary post if necessary.
R H A Enterprises v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without personal hearing due to inadequate notice on the GST portal, directing fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related notifications pending Supreme Court decision.
EMAAR INDIA LTD v. CITRON HOLDING LLP
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing refund and interest for delayed possession under a Builder Buyer Agreement, holding the claims were within limitation and termination valid.
U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. Arvind Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld most of the enhanced motor accident compensation awarded for permanent disability, allowing only deduction of double medical expenses previously paid.
Amit Sharma v. New India Assurance Co. Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that absence of endorsement on a driving license for transporting hazardous goods does not entitle the insurer to recover compensation from the insured where the driver was trained, licensed, and the vehicle was not proven to be carrying hazardous goods.
Dhirendra Prasad v. Baby Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s order setting aside an ex parte divorce decree due to sufficient cause shown by the respondent including counsel’s misconduct and illness despite delay.
Neelam Chandra v. Neeta Bahl & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.
Neeti Malhotra & Anr. v. AAR PEE APARTMENTS PVT. LTD
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously hear and decide the defendants' application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the suit before recording further evidence or hearing final arguments.
M/S DELHI PLYWOODS & ORS. v. M/S TRAK ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court recorded and enforced a settlement involving payment by installments with cheque undertakings, directing the parties to obtain a decree and providing for consequences of cheque dishonor.
Vivek Kumar Verma v. Nirmal Verma & Ors.
The High Court transferred a suit involving a commercial dispute to the appropriate Commercial Court under Section 24 CPC, setting aside the Trial Court's order returning the suit under Order VII Rule 10A CPC.
Prabha v. Indore Development Authority and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction over a consumer dispute where the cause of action arose outside Delhi and allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Gourav Samsukha v. M/S Raj Plastic
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdictional challenges under Order VII Rule 10 CPC must be decided promptly as a pure question of law and remanded the matter for fresh consideration by the trial court.
M/S INKEL LIMITED v. M/S TRIMASTER PVT LTD
The High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the jurisdictional challenge under Order VII Rule 10 CPC arising from conflicting jurisdiction clauses in contractual documents without awaiting evidence.
Kamlesh Dhingra v. Din Dayal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's non-appealable order refusing to take additional documents on record, holding such orders are not appealable under Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC.
Rajeev Sehgal v. Ved Prakash
The Delhi High Court dismissed the objection petition against a summary suit decree passed due to counsel's negligence, clarified that the civil decree is not an admission in related criminal proceedings, and stayed attachment warrants upon the appellant's undertaking to pay the decretal amount.
Lalit Sharma and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld its order requiring candidates to deposit Rs. 65,000 each to cover Shahdara Bar Association election expenses, disqualifying those who fail to comply.
Munish Jain v. Shikha Jain
The Delhi High Court modified its earlier order to direct conditional execution and custody of a gift deed in a matrimonial dispute, linking property transfer to the allowance of a second motion petition and cessation of maintenance liability.