Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
SK Kaushik v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that departmental proceedings initiated post-retirement without compliance to limitation under Rule 9 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 are invalid, quashing the charge memo issued against the petitioner after his superannuation.
The Medical Superintendent, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital v. Anuj Singh Chaprana & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of a termination order arising from reservation category errors, affirming that an employee cannot be penalized for administrative mistakes and directing compliance with the Tribunal's order including creation of supernumerary posts if necessary.
Staff Selection Commission v. Pratap Kalera
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Staff Selection Commission's petition, upholding the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination due to non-compliance with mandatory medical guidelines for hypertension in CAPF recruitment.
Passerine Wealth Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. Gurdev Singh Bhatia
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes under the Hotel Management Agreement.
Suunil Kohli v. Madhu Aggarwal
The High Court set aside the trial court’s order for failure to adjudicate on pecuniary jurisdiction, directing fresh consideration of the jurisdictional objection under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Lata Yadav v. Shivakriti Agro Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction to continue arbitration despite pending criminal proceedings and provisional attachment under PMLA, dismissing the petition seeking termination of arbitration on grounds of non-arbitrability.
Abhishek Gupta v. FIITJEE Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute.
Anju Gupta v. Praveen Kumar Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the execution order appointing a Local Commissioner for possession of land and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, directing maintenance of status quo.
Union of India & Anr. v. Reeta Thakur
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest on delayed pension and gratuity, holding that such benefits cannot be withheld or attached due to judicial proceedings initiated by private parties.
The Tamil Nadu Handloom Weaver's Co-operative Society Ltd. v. Kaptan Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award compensating a dismissed employee due to unfair disciplinary enquiry and limited scope of judicial interference under Article 226.
Central Board of Trustees, EPF v. M/S Glade Drugs & Nutraceuticals Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that orders passed independently under Section 7Q of the EPF Act imposing interest on delayed PF payments are not appealable under Section 7I, setting aside the EPFAT's order allowing such appeal.
Divyanshu Nandwani v. Kamal Kishore Nandwani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition and related reliefs, holding that the plaint failed to disclose a cause of action due to lack of specific pleading on ancestral or HUF character of the properties, and rejected the plaint in entirety under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Sonia Chhabra & Anr v. Shanta Grover & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging dismissal of a Section 6 Specific Relief Act suit, holding that the petitioners failed to prove illegal dispossession and no jurisdictional error was committed by the trial court.
Aditya Jain v. Sai Motors
The Delhi High Court condoned delay and allowed withdrawal of petitions with liberty to raise all contentions before the trial court, directing expeditious disposal of the pending suit.
Shri Gulab Singh v. M/S Bharat Timber Traders & Ors.
Revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders such as dismissal of amendment applications that do not finally dispose of the suit.
Pavan Paswan v. Ranjeet Yadav & Ors
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the motor accident claim appeal, directing enhanced compensation for 70% functional disability, future prosthetic limb costs, pain and suffering, attendant charges, loss of amenities, and disfigurement.
Chander Mohan Khandelwal v. Hemant Wadhwa
The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging a registered Sale Deed on the basis of an alleged collateral oral agreement inconsistent with the deed does not disclose a cause of action and is liable to be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Ministry of Finance through Secretary v. Shri Shahid Meezan
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order setting aside deemed resignation of a government employee on foreign deputation, clarifying that such resignation orders under the 2008 O.M. apply prospectively and VRS applications must be considered on merits.
Qamar Jahan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court approved a procedural framework for Customs detention of passenger goods, ordered release of petitioner’s gold jewellery with waiver of storage charges, and directed compliance pending amendment of the Baggage Rules.
M/S GAYATRI FURNITURE v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to non-visibility of the show cause notice on the GST portal, directing fresh hearing while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications to the Supreme Court.