Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rasi Innovation Pvt Ltd v. Superintendent, Ward 84, Delhi GST & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a vague show cause notice lacking specific statutory references is legally untenable and set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration, limiting cancellation to the date of the notice.
JCO GAS PIPE LIMITED v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 91 ZONE 8
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order for lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Sri Ganpati Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST, Delhi West
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration and correction of GST demand orders containing errors and duplication after affording a personal hearing to the petitioner.
JCO GAS PIPE LIMITED v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 91 ZONE 8
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a GST adjudication order, declined writ interference, and left the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act open pending Supreme Court adjudication.
Devi Charan v. New-Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court held that under the Street Vendors Act, substitution of a vending certificate upon the vendor's death is limited to the spouse or dependent child, dismissing the petition of a non-dependent son seeking such substitution.
Shaurya Suneja v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under rash and negligent driving charges based on a voluntary settlement and compensation paid to the victim, affirming the court's power to end proceedings in the interest of justice.
National Council of Educational Research and Training v. Parvesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that reservation details must be clearly specified in recruitment advertisements, set aside the quashing of the entire advertisement, and directed re-advertisement of the affected post with costs awarded to the aggrieved candidate.
R H A ENTERPRISES v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging a GST show cause notice and related order, directing the petitioner to file an appeal and leaving the validity of impugned notifications to be decided by the Supreme Court.
Shashi Kumar Choudhary v. Deputy Director Directorate General of GST Intelligence Delhi Zonal Unit & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a communication computing tax and penalty is not an adjudication order under the CGST Act and directed issuance of a Show Cause Notice before any demand can be raised.
Jasuja Electronics v. Empire Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to set aside an ex parte order, holding that the petitioner failed to provide a genuine explanation for delay and cannot shift responsibility to counsel despite Covid-19 disruptions.
U P State Road Transport Corporation v. Shivam Yadav & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award against the State Road Transport Corporation, affirming negligence of the bus driver, validating disability assessment, and enhancing certain heads of compensation and interest.
Union of India & Ors. v. Major Anish Muralidhar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attribution to military service and limiting writ review to legal errors only.
Neeraj Kohli v. The State & Anr.
In an uncontested petition for Letters of Administration, exemption from Administration and Surety Bonds requires a specific application before the Trial Court, which must be decided after hearing both parties.
Prem Nath Sarup (Exports) Pvt Ltd v. Sumit Agarwal
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a restoration application for a commercial suit due to inordinate delay and negligence of counsel, affirming that litigants bear responsibility for tracking their cases.
M/S MN AUTOMOBILE PRIVATE LIMITED v. GURIQBAL SINGH & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to furnish security instead of depositing rent arrears as directed, emphasizing strict compliance with court orders and rejecting vague attempts to delay proceedings.
Sudesh Chhikara v. Divisional Commissioner, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against eviction under the Senior Citizens Act, holding that summary proceedings with proper findings are valid and title disputes must be decided by civil courts.
Sanjay Goel v. SAG Infrastructure Developers Pvt Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discretion to allow recall of a witness for further cross-examination under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC in the interest of justice despite procedural irregularities.
Harkesh Bhardwaj & Anr. v. Krishna Nand
The Delhi High Court set aside the order directing warrants of arrest in execution proceedings for non-compliance with statutory provisions and protocols, allowing execution to proceed with safeguards.
Amar Sen & Anr. v. Ajit Kumar Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that the timeline for filing written statements in civil suits is directory, not mandatory, and set aside the Trial Court's order striking off defence for belated filing without sufficient cause.
Tinku Gupta v. Narender Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging conditional leave to defend in a summary suit but waived costs and granted one month to deposit the directed amount considering the petitioner’s financial condition.