Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rampat Azad v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the CAT and High Court orders denying the appellant promotion as Handicrafts Promotion Officer, affirming his regularisation and promotion rights solely within the cadre of Carpet Training Officer.
Ramjee Prasad Jaiswal and Ors v. State of Bihar
The Supreme Court set aside the convictions of appellants due to failure to comply with Section 313 CrPC and established juvenility of one appellant, emphasizing the mandatory nature of procedural fairness and juvenility claims in criminal trials.
Shaifali Gupta v. Vidya Devi Gupta & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that a plaint in a partition suit involving alleged joint Hindu family properties cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on benami grounds without evidence, dismissing the Special Leave Petitions challenging the rejection of such applications.
M/S ANVITAAUTO TECH WORKS PVT. LTD. v. M/S AROUSH MOTORS & ANR.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal holding that the COVID-19 limitation extension applies to the mandatory 120-day period for filing written statements in commercial suits and that non-filing does not extinguish the right to cross-examination, thereby remanding the case for fresh adjudication.
Mahesh Chand Gupta & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine, voluntary settlement between estranged spouses, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings to secure justice.
Prateek Verma & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a genuine and voluntary settlement between matrimonial parties, applying Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Saleem & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary mutual settlement between the parties, promoting peace and harmony.
Prashant Gattani alias Girdhar Gattani and Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Anil Kumar Singh and Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a Combined Seniority List of CRPF Inspectors across cadres and dismissed the petition challenging seniority and promotion eligibility, affirming seniority based on date of confirmation and administrative relaxation powers.
Sunil Kumar Bijarniya v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of a probationary constable from the Railway Protection Special Force for suppression of a pending FIR in his attestation form, affirming the employer's discretion to terminate service during probation based on antecedents and character verification.
Jagtar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a government servant retained in service despite service-attributable disability is entitled to lump sum compensation under CCS (EOP) Rules, and delay in claiming disability pension does not bar relief.
Inderjeet Singh Negi v. Sh Irshad & Ors
The Delhi High Court remanded a motor accident compensation claim for fresh assessment of permanent disability and medical expenses, directing the Tribunal to award adequate compensation following established legal principles.
Manoj Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court reduced the petitioner’s dismissal from BSF service to compulsory retirement, holding the original punishment disproportionate despite proven misconduct.
Shri Yashpal Singh v. The Secretary Land and Building Department
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging denial of an alternative plot allotment under the 1961 Scheme, holding the appellant ineligible due to ownership of residential property and delay in pursuing rights.
The Maison Company v. Sh. Anwar Ali and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte Labour Court award for lack of reasoned findings and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned orders in quasi-judicial decisions.
Railtech Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate consolidated disputes arising from railway supply contracts, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny under Section 11(6) and the need to avoid multiplicity of arbitration proceedings.
Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-1, New Delhi v. Coursera Inc.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s ruling that receipts of an online education platform do not constitute taxable fees for included services under the India-USA DTAA as the services do not 'make available' technical knowledge.
Arijit Mazumdar, Shambo Nandy, Anoushka Dey, Khushboo Hora and Archita Nigam v. BILT GRAPHIC PAPER PRODUCTS LTD
The Delhi High Court held that interest on an arbitral award accrues from the date of the award regardless of the date of payment of stamp duty, affirming that insufficient stamping does not invalidate the award.
Rajiv Singal v. Sanjeev Singal and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted a preliminary decree for partition of properties among siblings based on clear admissions and relinquishment deeds, rejecting the defendant's claim of a valid Will.
Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation-1, New Delhi v. Coursera Inc.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT’s ruling that receipts by Coursera Inc. for providing an online learning platform do not constitute taxable fees for technical services under the India-USA DTAA as the services did not 'make available' any technical knowledge or skill.