Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
G4S Secure Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. v. Ranjeet Kumar
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties involving payment of Rs. 5,00,000 as full and final settlement.
Major Anish Muralidhar v. Ex Hav Dinesh Rautela
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted.
Sunil Chaudhary v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the respondents permitted the petitioner to have a Defence Assistant in the inquiry proceedings.
Jatinder Kaur Sawhney v. Canara Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of a non-borrower occupant challenging SARFAESI recovery proceedings, holding that possession without statutory rights does not confer locus standi to obstruct lawful bank possession.
Mata Amritanandmayi Math v. Anil Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief restoring plaintiff's possession and access after defendants unlawfully encroached and blocked access to his land, emphasizing protection of settled possession and compliance with statutory land description requirements.
M/S OOZ MEDIA SOLUTIONS v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II/AVATO, WARD 61 & ORS
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte GST adjudication order due to denial of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act open pending Supreme Court decision.
Kamal Kumar v. Union of India & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking quashing of a complaint under Section 177 IPC, holding that the petitioner must pursue revision against the discharge order and that prosecution under both Customs Act and IPC for the same offence amounts to double jeopardy.
Mahinder Singh v. Jaswant Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's review petition and upheld the order granting judgment to defendants on admissions of oral partition evidenced by a Memorandum of Partition under Order 12 Rule 6 CPC.
Meenu Jain v. Gaurav Jain
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of appeals on limitation grounds, affirming that delay condonation requires cogent reasons and interim reliefs under the Domestic Violence Act cannot be granted where separate proceedings exist.
CNB FINWIZ LTD v. DCIT, CIRCLE 6(1)
The Delhi High Court held that reopening of income tax assessment requires tangible material forming a reason to believe, and mere suspicion or vague information about penny stock transactions does not justify reassessment.
Shri Samay Garg v. Shri Ram Kumar Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for partition based on an unregistered Will, holding that the deceased had validly sold the property during his lifetime, thus negating the Plaintiff's cause of action.
Shri Samay Garg v. Shri Ram Rattan Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's application to reject the plaint, holding that the plaintiff's possession under a 1999 agreement to sell is protected under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, and the suit for declaration, specific performance, and injunction is maintainable and within limitation.
Deepak Kumar Singh v. Yogendra Pal Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to order forensic examination of disputed Wills in a probate petition, holding that such scientific investigation is not mandatory absent suspicious circumstances.
Vikas Kumar v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused persons involved in a group fight after considering mutual injuries, partisan police conduct, and prolonged incarceration.
Paschal Obinna Nwagbaoso v. Narcotics Control Bureau
Bail was denied to the accused in a narcotics case involving intermediate and commercial quantities, holding that procedural violations under NDPS Act cannot be considered at bail stage and parity does not apply when incriminating recovery exists.
Mr. Izhar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that while it cannot direct registration of an FIR, it can grant police protection to a petitioner facing security threats, directing the police to ensure confidentiality and vigilance at her new residence.
Kamal Kumar & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354B, 506, 509, and 34 IPC after the parties amicably settled their dispute, imposing costs on petitioners to deter future misconduct.
Vijay Kumar & Anr. v. The State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following a mutual settlement and divorce by consent between the parties.
Madhu Tayal v. Shri Ghanshyam Das Tayal
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant cannot deny the landlord's title and dismissed the appeal challenging possession, granting the appellant time to vacate the premises.
Rahul @ Moni @ Sannothiya v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of murder, emphasizing parity with co-accused, the impact of delayed weapon recovery on evidence, and the right to a speedy trial under Article 21.