Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anil Kumar v. Lt. Governor, National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse if compensation is not paid within five years of the award as per Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, even if the award predates the 2013 Act.
State Bank of India v. Kanahiya Lal & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that written letters acknowledging liability constituted a valid promise to pay a time-barred debt under Section 25(3) of the Indian Contract Act, thereby reviving the limitation period and allowing the Bank's recovery suit.
USHA MEHTA v. Defendant
The Delhi High Court enforced a settlement agreement leading to withdrawal of one suit, decree of possession in the connected suit, and directed the Court Receiver to hand over possession without enhancing fees.
Tarjit Singh v. M/S Popular Sales Pvt Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a belated application for handwriting expert examination filed at the final argument stage, holding that such applications require timely filing and explanation to prevent abuse of process.
S Tarjit Singh v. M/S Popular Sales Pvt Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's rejection of a belated application for handwriting examination of powers of attorney filed at the final arguments stage, emphasizing the need for timely disclosure and explanation for delay.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-1 v. RAJIV GUPTA
The Delhi High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals against ITAT orders on assessments framed under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, holding that no substantial question of law arises in view of binding precedent.
Ankit Garg v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court extended interim bail protection to petitioners pending commitment of the case to the trial court and directed them to seek regular bail thereafter.
Virender Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal proceeding under Section 498-A IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ashwani Bindra & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A/406/34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on a genuine compromise between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Rajiv Kumar Tomar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging a Single Judge's order already upheld in earlier appeals, reaffirming the principle of finality and res judicata.
Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) ICD v. M/S Balaji Handloom
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by the Principal Commissioner of Customs challenging writ petitions disposed of in line with a prior binding judgment, affirming judicial consistency and finality.
Anil Kumar & Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving simple assault after amicable settlement between parties, subject to community service conditions, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Munna Saxena v. State
The Delhi High Court held that kidnapping accompanied by ransom demand without threat or apprehension of harm does not attract Section 364A IPC and modified the conviction to Section 363 IPC.
Burger King Corporation v. Mr. Shameek & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted injunctive relief to Burger King Corporation against defendants using a deceptively similar mark, holding that failure to file a written statement permits judgment under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC and that the defendants' mark infringed the plaintiff's well-known trademark.
Parmod @ Prince & Anr v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a theft FIR under Sections 380/411/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Satish & Ors. v. State (Government of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Jitender Sahni & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. following an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the Court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Mohd Rahim Akbari v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable FIR under Sections 324/452/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Ashif & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 506(II), and 34 IPC based on an amicable compromise between parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Deepak Swami & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Section 482 Cr.P.C. based on an amicable settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.