Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) ICD v. M/S Balaji Handloom

Delhi High Court · 02 May 2016 · 2016:DHC:3374-DB
The Chief Justice; Jayant Nath
LPA 126/2016
2016:DHC:3374-DB
administrative appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by the Principal Commissioner of Customs challenging writ petitions disposed of in line with a prior binding judgment, affirming judicial consistency and finality.

Full Text
Translation output
LPA 126/2016, 100/2016, 90/2016, 145/2016
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
JUDGMENT
Pronounced on: 02.05.2016
LPA 126/2016 & CMs. 7036/2016 (stay)
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) ICD ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Satish Kumar, Advocate.
versus
M/S BALAJI HANDLOOM ..... Respondent
Through: Mrs. Anjali with Mr.Priyadarshi Manish, Advocates.
LPA 100/2016 & CM.No.5358/2016 (stay)
OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Satish Kumar, Advocate.
versus
M/S N J OVERSEAS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Priyadarshi Manish, Advocate.
LPA 90/2016 & CM.No.4763/2016 (stay)
OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) ..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Satish Kumar with Mr. Agrim Bhasin, Advocates.
versus
M/S MAA DURGA TRADERS ..... Respondent
Through: Mr.Priyadarshi Manish with Ms.Anjali M.
Manish, Advocates.
LPA 145/2016 & CM.No.8087/2016 (stay)
OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) ICD ..... Appellant 2016:DHC:3374-DB
LPA 126/2016, 100/2016, 90/2016, 145/2016
Through: Mr.Satish Kumar, Standing Counsel for the appellant.
versus
M/S GROVER TEX PRINTS P. LTD. ..... Respondent
Through: Nemo.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.

1. The learned Single Judge by the impugned order in the present appeals disposed of the writ petitions filed by the respondents in terms of the order passed in the case of CWP No. 3598/2015 in the case of M/S. Santosh Handloom vs. Principal Commissioner of Customs dated 23.11.2015 and passed appropriate directions.

2. The appellant in these appeals had also challenged the aforenoted order of the learned Single Judge dated 23.11.2015 in CWP No. 3598/2015 in LPA No. 88/2016. We have by judgment dated 29.04.2016 dismissed the said appeal LPA No. 88/2016 filed by the appellant.

3. In view of the dismissal of LPA No. 88/2016, the present appeals also are dismissed in terms of the said judgment of this court dated 29.04.2016.

JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE MAY 02, 2016