Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. MOHINDER KAUR ANAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. LALIT KUMAR GOEL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JAI PRAKASH TYAGI
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SHER SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JAGBIR SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. RAM SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JYOTSNA SURI
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, holding that fresh land acquisition proceedings must be initiated within one year under the 2013 Act or possession must be returned to the original owner.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SOSHIL KUMAR JAIN
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original landowners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. MANJU BALA
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the acquiring authority must initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year or return possession to the original owner under the 2013 Act.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. PAWAN KUMAR GARG
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year under the LARR Act or return possession to the original landowner.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. OM PRAKASH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, granting it one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S. NIM INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE(P)LTD
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original landowners.
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA v. DSQ SOFTWARE LTD. & ANR
The Supreme Court allowed SEBI's appeal, set aside the SAT orders due to non-deposit of Rs. 30 Crores by the respondent, and revived the original SEBI order dated 9th September, 2004.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. AMARJIT SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal and allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JAGDISH P. KHANNA
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, granting it one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owner.
Delhi Development Authority v. Mohd. Naseem
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original landowners.
Delhi Development Authority v. Kusham Jain
The Supreme Court held that failure to pay compensation to landowners before 1.1.2014 under the 2013 Act causes acquisition proceedings to lapse, dismissing DDA's appeal and allowing fresh acquisition only under the new Act.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal against land acquisition proceedings, allowing one year to initiate fresh acquisition under the 2013 Act or return possession to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. KESHAV SURI
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owner.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SUKHBIR SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.