Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Babita Lila & Another v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that a complaint under Section 195 CrPC alleging offences in income tax search proceedings must be filed by the competent appellate authority, and the Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigation)-I, Bhopal, lacked such competence, rendering the prosecution invalid.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SIDDHARTH GUPTA
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year under the LARR Act or return possession to the original landowners.
KEDAR NATH YADAV v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
The Supreme Court upheld the acquisition of land by West Bengal for Tata Motors as a valid public purpose under the Land Acquisition Act, emphasizing the broad and evolving nature of public purpose in eminent domain.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SHYAM LAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SHAMIM QURESHI
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must revert to original landowners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. ISHWAR SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. RAM PRAKASH KATHURIA
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. KRISHAN KANT GOYAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but granted one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owner.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. UDAY SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. CHAND
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year under the 2013 Act or return possession to the original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. RATTAN SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year or return possession to original owners under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. HARKISHAN
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.
M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD. v. ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
The Supreme Court held that the Interest on Delayed Payment to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 applies retroactively to payments due after its commencement, allowing recovery of interest on delayed payments irrespective of contract date.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SHYAM SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, granting it one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original landowners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. AJAY SINGHAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original landowners.
Macrotech Developers Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that prosecution unrelated to tax arrear does not bar settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, quashing the impugned circular clarification and allowing the petitioner’s declaration.
Manish Babra v. Renu
The Delhi High Court set aside a decree of restitution of conjugal rights passed without evidence, holding that such relief requires proof and cannot be granted alongside a divorce petition.
Maharaj I S Wahi v. Renuka Wahi
The Delhi High Court held that a party is entitled to lead rebuttal evidence after closing its case without expressly reserving the right, and allowed the petitioner to prove emails denied by the respondent during cross-examination.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAMESH & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award based on claimant's actual qualification and disability, allowing interest except for adjournment period due to disability certificate delay.
Aashish Gupta v. Central Board of Excise & Customs
The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative allotment of the petitioner to Chandigarh zone based on merit and vacancy availability despite his preference for Delhi, dismissing his challenge to the recruitment process.