Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. MUKESH KOCHHAR
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. VEENU KOCHER
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and allowed the Delhi Development Authority one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. GIANI
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, holding that fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act must be initiated within one year or possession must be returned to the original owner.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. M/S. GAURAV WELDMESH PVT. LTD.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, holding that fresh acquisition proceedings must be initiated within one year under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original landowner.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. OM PRAKASH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed a one-year period to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. BRIJESH AGGARWAL
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, directing it to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year under the LARR Act or return possession to the original landowners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. VIJENDER KUMAR
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. RAJESH KUMAR YADAV ALIAS RAJESH YADAV
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal but allowed the Delhi Development Authority one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.
Delhi Development Authority v. Om Prakash
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original landowners.
Land & Building Department through Secretary v. Giriraj Singh
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that fresh land acquisition proceedings must be initiated within one year under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original landowner.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. SURENDER SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Delhi Development Authority but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. JAGBIR SINGH
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings lapse if possession and compensation are not completed within the prescribed period under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, but allowed the authority one year to initiate fresh proceedings.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. AJIT SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal, holding that failure to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year under the 2013 Act requires returning possession to original landowners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. ZILE SINGH
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the LARR Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. VIJAY DHAWAN HUF
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeals but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. GEETA DHAWAN
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeals, granting one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original landowners.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. AMIN KHAN
The Supreme Court dismissed the Delhi Development Authority's appeal but allowed one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
Land & Building Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. Rattan Singh
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal but allowed the acquiring authority one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. NARENDER KUMAR
The Supreme Court dismissed the Government of NCT of Delhi's appeal, allowing one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to original owners.
Land and Building Department Thr Secretary Govt. of NCT of Delhi, New Delhi and Anr v. Dinesh Kumar and Ors
The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal but allowed the appellant one year to initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings under the 2013 Act, failing which possession must be returned to the original owners.