DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. MANJU BALA

Supreme Court of India · 31 Aug 2016
KURIAN JOSEPH; C. NAGAPPAN
CIVIL APPEAL No.8656 OF 2016
property appeal_dismissed Significant

AI Summary

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the acquiring authority must initiate fresh land acquisition proceedings within one year or return possession to the original owner under the 2013 Act.

Full Text
Translation output
Page 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL No.8656 OF 2016
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.10159 of 2016)
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
MANJU BALA AND ORS. RESPONDENT(S)
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The issue, in principle, is covered against the appellant by judgment in Civil Appeal No.8477 of 2016 arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.8467 of 2015.

3. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

4. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the appellant is given a period of one year to exercise its liberty granted under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for initiation of the acquisition proceedings afresh. Page 2

5. We make it clear that in case no fresh acquisition proceedings are initiated within the said period of one year from today by issuing a Notification under Section 11 of the Act, the appellant, if in possession, shall return the physical possession of the land to the original land owner.

6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of ................ J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] ............... J. [C. NAGAPPAN] New Delhi, August 31, 2016