Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Jaman Lal Kanhaya Lal v. Ram Moorti Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds for office premises of a practicing advocate, dismissing the tenant's revision petition challenging the order.
Ishwar Singh Decd. Through Lrs. & Ors. v. Suraj Bhan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts have jurisdiction over disputes concerning transfer of bhumidari rights, invalidated mutation in favor of appellants, and upheld the respondents' title and possession rights under valid transfer documents.
State of Maharashtra v. Dr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth
The Supreme Court held that deemed universities have the autonomous right to conduct counselling and admit students based on NEET merit lists, and the State cannot impose centralized counselling without statutory authority, directing a joint counselling process for subsequent admissions.
Medical Council of India v. Harshitha & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that students given conditional MBBS admission dependent on NEET qualification have no right to continue studies or gain admission elsewhere if they fail to meet conditions, setting aside the High Court's order directing their accommodation.
NITU v. SHEELA RANI
The Supreme Court held that under the Family Pension Scheme, 1964, only the widow is entitled to receive family pension, excluding other legal heirs such as the deceased's mother.
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Rajesh Chander Sood
The Supreme Court upheld the State’s repeal of the Himachal Pradesh Corporate Sector Employees Pension Scheme, ruling no vested pension rights arose before retirement and the cut-off date was valid.
NAGARPALIKA THAKURDWARA v. KHALIL AHMED
The Supreme Court held that Section 102 CPC does not bar second appeals in suits involving declaratory and injunctive reliefs alongside monetary claims, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.
Gujarat Maritime Board v. L&T Infrastructure Development Projects Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that an unconditional bank guarantee is an independent contract and the High Court erred in restraining its invocation under Article 226 without exceptional circumstances like egregious fraud.
Somasundaram @ Somu v. State Rep. by Dy. Comm. of Police
The Supreme Court upheld the convictions for abduction and murder based on reliable accomplice testimony and corroborative evidence, clarifying the application of conspiracy and abetment principles under IPC.
Jasbirkaur v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions seeking quashing of FIRs following a settlement between parties, dismissing the petitions as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petitions based on compromise.
Sanjay & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a trivial quarrel causing simple injuries after the parties amicably settled their dispute, holding that continuing criminal proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose.
Girishchawla v. Rishidev Sharma Delhi Co-Operative Group Housing Society Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions as satisfied after the respondent assured issuance of TDS certificates following deposit of TDS amounts related to arbitral awards.
Mewell Biotech Pvt Ltd & Ors v. Taranjeet Singh
The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petitions as withdrawn following an arbitration settlement between the parties.
Bhola Ram Patel v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court clarified that NDMC may remove street vendors obstructing public pathways while respecting pre-existing rights and seniority pending final adjudication by the Town Vending Committee under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
Vishnu Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court disposed of two connected applications by referring to its earlier detailed judgment in a related appeal, without granting separate relief.
Vishnu Sharma v. New Delhi Municipal Council
The Delhi High Court disposed of two applications seeking clarification and directions by referring to its detailed judgment in a connected appeal.
Raghunandan Sharma v. Jai Kumari & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit challenging rights in immovable property subject to a decree is barred under Order XXI Rule 101 CPC and must be adjudicated in execution proceedings, allowing the appeal and setting aside the decree in favor of the respondents.
Sh. Surender Singh @ Sunder & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decision granting the daughter of the deceased landowner her rightful share in compensation for acquired land, emphasizing that mutation does not confer title and uncontested claims must be accepted.
SYSDIVA CONSULTANTS PVT LTD & ANR v. FSL SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD & ORS
The Delhi High Court disposed of a copyright infringement-related suit by accepting the defendants' undertaking against tortious interference and defamatory statements, with the plaintiffs relinquishing damages claims.
Raj Singh v. The Commissioner of Police & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld departmental enquiry findings against a police constable for unauthorized vehicle release, ruling that acquittal in criminal trial does not bar departmental proceedings based on preponderance of probabilities.