Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S VANSHIKA BUILDTECH LTD v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that NDMC's demand for old electricity arrears raised after ten years is barred by limitation and quashed the demand against the subsequent purchaser of the property.
IMPRESARIO ENTERTAINMENT & HOSPITALITY PVT LTD v. MECH MOCHA GAME STUDIOS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit based on the defendant's undertaking not to use the disputed mark in the plaintiff's business domain, thereby restraining the defendant from using 'MECH MOCHA' in the food and beverages industry.
Union of India & Ors. v. Satinder Singh Jat
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction to entertain suits challenging disciplinary orders under the CISF Act, which must be challenged by writ petitions under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution.
Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise, Mumbai v. M/s. Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise and set aside the impugned order against M/s. Dharamsi Morarji Chemical Co. Ltd. following the Larger Bench ruling in a related case.
Shankar Hiranna Rajanna v. Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority
The Supreme Court held that MHADA must permit redevelopment by a developer who has secured 70% tenant consent under its regulations, directing tenants to vacate and the developer to complete construction within a fixed timeframe.
GOVT. OF BIHAR AND ORS. v. DAYANAND SINGH
The Supreme Court held that reservation in Bihar Judicial Services requires proper consultation with the High Court under Articles 233 and 234, quashing invalid reservation rules and directing a constitutionally compliant process.
Krishan Kumar Singhal v. L.C. Goyal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of contempt petitions arising from a stayed order, allowing fresh proceedings after the Supreme Court's decision on special leave petitions.
Beenadevi v. Sheelbansal
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a belated written statement subject to costs, emphasizing that procedural grievances should be addressed through proper applications before the trial court.
Prabhu Dayal Jain v. Bush Foods Overseas Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted an ex parte decree for recovery of Rs.1.25 crore with interest to a grain merchant against a defaulting rice trading company based on invoices, accounts, and dishonoured cheques.
Taxus Infrastructure and Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Schneider Electric India Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that arbitral tribunal fees fixed with party consent cannot be challenged to terminate the tribunal and that party-nominated arbitrators validly appointed a substitute presiding arbitrator after resignation.
Santosh Kumar Mandal v. State
The Delhi High Court held that offences under Section 12 of the POCSO Act are cognizable and non-bailable, dismissing the bail application of the petitioner accused of wrongful confinement and harassment of a minor student.
Pradeep Dahiya v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a married petitioner accused of harassing and threatening a woman and interfering with her matrimonial life, holding that serious allegations and misuse of interim protection warranted denial.
Sanjay Mahajan v. Sunil Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that a suit against a newly added defendant is barred by limitation unless the court orders otherwise, and the plaintiff failed to prove loan to the original defendant.
Tenzin Chuki v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that persons born in India between 1950 and 1987 who meet statutory citizenship criteria cannot be denied Indian passports based on administrative resolutions concerning Tibetan refugees.
Sh. Mahavir Gupta v. Sh. Shobha Ram Saran
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding dismissal of leave to defend in a summary suit under Order XXXVII CPC where the defendant's defence was found to be illusory and unsupported by evidence.
Raj Pal & Anr. v. Deepak Makwana
The court held that reliance on a de-exhibited document to dismiss execution objections is erroneous and restored the objections for trial with directions to lead evidence on the disputed property area.
M/S SILVER TOUCH ENTERPRISES v. RADHA SHARMA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside a compensation award under the Employee’s Compensation Act for non-consideration of resignation and employer-employee relationship, remanding the matter for fresh evidence and decision.
Bhupinder Singh v. DRI
The High Court held that a voluntary plea of guilt supported by mitigating factors including prolonged trial and serious illness justifies sentencing below the statutory minimum under the Customs Act, restoring the conviction and sentence set aside by the Sessions Judge.
SGSIL Geophysical Services Private Limited v. Sowar Private Limited
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with formal meetings due to unanimous written consents from shareholders and creditors.
Jones Lang LaSalle Meghraj Building Operations (NCR) Private Limited v. Homebay Residential Private Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring statutory approvals and undertakings for liabilities were in place.