Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Deepak v. State Govt. of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for kidnapping and aggravated penetrative sexual assault of a minor under the IPC and POCSO Act, affirming the statutory presumption of guilt and the sufficiency of corroborative evidence despite absence of forensic proof.
M/S COPS SECURITY AND ALLIED SERVICES v. VINAY KUMAR RAI AND ANOTHER
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Labour Court's award of compensation for illegal termination, holding that the management failed to prove any settlement or voluntary abandonment by the workman.
SUN TEC WEB SERVICES PVT. LTD v. SUNIL KUMAR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the Labour Court's award of compensation for illegal termination due to the employer's failure to prove voluntary resignation.
Bhalla Sports Pvt. Ltd. v. Ashutosh Bhalla M/S Vinex Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the prior user of a trademark has superior rights over a subsequent registrant and cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar trademark registration obtained in bad faith.
Neelam Sharma and Anr. v. Sameer Kumar
The High Court dismissed the criminal revision petition as withdrawn without examining merits, leaving all rights open for trial court adjudication.
Pawan Kumar Paswan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a man for aggravated sexual assault of a four-year-old minor under the POCSO Act, holding that the victim's reliable testimony and corroborative evidence sufficed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Ajay Gupta and Anr. v. Amit Sales Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lifting of the corporate veil to hold directors personally liable for dishonoured cheques issued with mala fide intent and evasion of legal process.
Shri Ashok Gaur v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court upheld the acquittal under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the accused successfully rebutted statutory presumptions by raising a probable defense and the complainant failed to prove the existence of debt.
Syed Danish Azeem v. Nazia Parveen @ Nazia & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s maintenance award to the wife and minor child, rejecting the husband’s belated claim of a second marriage and additional dependents due to deliberate concealment of material facts.
Surestha v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR involving physical abuse and electrocution of a minor child, holding that serious offences against children cannot be quashed merely on the basis of compromise.
Mili Debnath v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the summoning order against a petitioner shown only as a beneficiary in a fraud case, holding that mere receipt of money without evidence of involvement is insufficient to face trial.
K v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused from rape and sexual harassment charges due to unexplained delay, lack of corroborative evidence, and absence of grave suspicion at the charge framing stage.
Bansi Kumar v. State
The High Court acquitted the appellant of abduction and rape charges due to unreliable proof of prosecutrix's minority and contradictions in evidence, emphasizing the need for reliable age determination and voluntary statements under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
Mohd Arup v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a human trafficking and prostitution case, emphasizing his active role, victim identification, and absconding after interim bail.
Sheetal Suri; Dolly v. Sukhdev Singh; Raghubir Singh; Jasmine Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the partition suit for non-joinder of necessary parties and failure to prove key documents beyond pleadings, holding that all co-sharers must be parties for valid partition.
Yogesh Kumar Gupta v. Bobby Goreja
The Delhi High Court disposed of a possession dispute petition on the parties' amicable settlement, directing the petitioner to vacate the premises by a specified date under an affidavit undertaking.
Geeta Pal v. Badami Devi
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for mandatory injunction is maintainable upon revocation of a license for permissive use, and the trial court rightly refused to reject the plaint.
M/S SHINE TRAVELS AND CARGO PVT LTD v. SH.BAJRANGI PRASAD & ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award holding the petitioner's termination of the workman illegal due to failure to prove proper notice and procedure.
Rajeev Jain & Anr. v. Gulshan Kumar Jain Through LR
The High Court held that striking off defence without issuing a mandatory show cause notice under Order XV-A(2) CPC violates natural justice and set aside the Trial Court's order accordingly.
India Biz Com v. Yokohoma India Pvt. Ltd.
The High Court held that while setting aside an ex parte decree, imposing the condition to deposit the entire decretal amount is onerous and reduced the security deposit to 10% of the suit amount.