Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S Arjan Dass and Sons Private Limited v. Tinna Rubber and Infra Limited
The High Court allowed belated filing of an amended written statement under Order VI Rule 17 CPC with costs, emphasizing discretion to condone delay in the interest of justice while discouraging negligence.
Soni Dave v. M/S Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt Ltd
The High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the respondent's pending application to prevent delay in recording the petitioner's evidence, emphasizing party cooperation.
Vakil Singh v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused involved in delivery of commercial quantity ganja, holding that strict conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were not met and procedural delays did not warrant bail.
Aditya Dave and Ors. v. M/S Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to decide the application under Order VI Rule 16 CPC and the injunction application together within eight weeks to ensure expeditious disposal.
Shri Ramesh Kumar v. Shri Mohit Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as not pressed, clarified that interim observations are tentative and directed the Trial Court to expedite the suit's final disposal.
Dr Aastha Raj v. National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences
Delhi High Court quashed NBEMS order cancelling candidature and debarment for unfair means due to lack of evidence and violation of natural justice, directing declaration of results.
M/S Derive N Fill v. Germani Prasad
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award reinstating the workman with 50% back wages, holding that the employer failed to prove misconduct or voluntary resignation despite ample opportunity to lead evidence.
Gulshan Chawla v. Neetu Gera & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte order, holding that interference is not warranted when the matter is reserved for judgment.
Kamal Kumar Gautam v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 498A IPC following an amicable settlement and divorce decree, emphasizing that continuing criminal proceedings would be futile and not conducive to peace.
Rahul Sharma v. The State (Govt of NCT Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the married parties, emphasizing the futility of continuing criminal proceedings after voluntary resolution.
Deepak Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 287 and 337 IPC based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, applying Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and relevant Supreme Court precedents.
Sumit Kumar Gupta & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, exercising its power under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023.
Eashan Pandya v. The State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a motor accident FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC following a voluntary settlement and compounding of related offences, emphasizing the court's power under Section 528 BNSS to promote peace and avoid futile litigation.
Mayank Sondhi & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial offences FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable mediation settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would serve no useful purpose.
Rajab Ali Khan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's 12th bail application in a heinous child kidnapping, sexual assault, and murder case, holding that strong prima facie evidence and the gravity of the offence preclude bail once trial has commenced.
Ajit Jaiswal v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case involving commercial quantity of narcotics, emphasizing that procedural lapses and disputed evidence require trial adjudication and that bail may be granted subject to conditions despite the bar under Section 37.
Celebi Airport Services India Private Limited v. Union of India; Celebi Delhi Cargo Terminal Management India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of airport ground handling companies' security clearances without prior hearing or reasons, holding that national security concerns justify exclusion of natural justice principles under the statutory framework.
Rajesh Kumar v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging penal demand for electricity theft, holding that alternate remedies before Civil or Special Electricity Courts must be pursued.
ASOCIACION DE PRODUCTORES DE PISCO A.G. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that both Chile and Peru have legitimate rights to the GI 'PISCO' as homonymous geographical indications, setting aside the IPAB order granting exclusive GI registration to Peru without a prefix.
Albemarle Corporation v. The Controller of Patents
Delhi High Court allowed amendment of patent claims at appellate stage, remanding the application for fresh examination limited to narrowed auxiliary claims under the Patents Act, 1970.