Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. v. MOHD JAVED THROUGH SHEHNAZ AND ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the compensation awarded for future medical expenses and attendant charges in a motor accident claim while allowing the appellant to withdraw the appeal challenging recovery rights post statutory amendment.
SSC and Anr. v. Sandeep
The High Court held that courts have limited scope to interfere with medical board findings supported by clinical evidence and set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination for a candidate declared unfit due to Knock Knee.
National Institute of Plant Genome Research v. Vipin Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Authority's award of compensation equal to the wage differential under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, dismissing challenges by the principal employer and contractor.
Union of India & Ors. v. Anjani Bana
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a fresh medical examination including an orthopedic specialist to reassess a candidate's fitness after conflicting medical reports and absence of specialist opinion in earlier examinations.
Kunaj Raj v. Rahul Kumar Meena
The Delhi High Court held that a probationer is not deemed confirmed without a formal confirmation order and set aside the Tribunal's order of deemed confirmation, remanding the matter for further consideration.
SSC and Anr. v. Rajesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that judicial interference in medical fitness decisions for disciplined forces recruitment is limited and set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh medical examination, upholding the Review Medical Board's finding of unfitness.
PUMA SE v. HIMANSHU SHARMA
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of PUMA SE against a defendant selling counterfeit goods, holding that deliberate infringement of well-known trademarks warrants injunction, damages, and costs.
National Highways Authority of India v. M.G. Contractors P. Ltd- Arvind Techno Engineers P. Ltd. (JV)
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award granting compensation for delay in handing over site and overhead losses, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting the Petitioner's challenge based on waiver and patent illegality.
Srikanta Sutar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to reconsider a transfer order issued without allowing the petitioner to submit posting preferences due to a technical glitch, emphasizing adherence to transfer policy and natural justice.
Airports Authority Employees Union v. Airports Authority of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a petition challenging a 2020 communication allowing informal discussions with unions polling over 30% votes, upholding the validity of a 2018 majority union recognition for a fixed term.
Snerea Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -18
The Delhi High Court held that transfer of shares of a company holding immovable property does not amount to transfer of the property itself, and additions under Section 68 cannot be made against the company on that basis without actual transfer of property.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex NB Sub Khem Bahadur Thapa
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities detected during service are service-related unless the employer proves otherwise, and limited its interference to legal errors only.
Navneet v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging mandatory Physics qualification in TGT (Mathematics) recruitment, holding employer's prescribed essential qualifications are binding and not subject to judicial interference absent ambiguity or contravention of recruitment rules.
Priya Chauhan and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that challenges to recruitment rules of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition for lack of jurisdiction.
M/S. BVG INDIA LTD. v. NAGAR NIGAM JAIPUR GREATER & ANR
In absence of a designated seat of arbitration, the court at the place where arbitration proceedings are conducted has exclusive jurisdiction, and a general exclusive jurisdiction clause does not override this principle.
Prism Johnson Ltd v. Doosan Power Systems India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that parties may agree on a distinct procedure for appointment of arbitrators differing from institutional rules, and court may appoint an arbitrator if a party fails to act under that agreed procedure, allowing the petition for appointment of respondent's arbitrator.
Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd v. Mirador Commercial Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the Sole Arbitrator’s appointment under Clause 39.2 of the contract, dismissing the Petitioner’s challenge that it was a unilateral appointment violating party autonomy and arbitration law.
Ravi Patwardhan v. N.K. Jambholkar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the quashing of appointments as academic since the petitioners had already served their tenure under interim orders and were entitled to retiral benefits.
India Steel v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to lack of proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court.
Pavan Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks, emphasizing the obligation to avoid undue delay without expressing any opinion on the merits.