Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shyam Kali Dubey v. State of Madhya Pradesh
The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence, unreliable dying declaration, and reasonable doubt arising from family disputes and medical testimony.
Krishnakant Kwivedy & Another v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of the FIR against certain respondents, holding that specific allegations prima facie disclosing offences must proceed to trial and factual disputes cannot be decided at the quashing stage.
Sarva Shramik Sangh v. The Commissioner, Thane Mahanagar Palika
The Bombay High Court held that 53 workmen illegally terminated by Thane Municipal Corporation are entitled to reinstatement without back wages despite procedural delays, affirming their status as direct employees rather than contract laborers.
Madhukar Dnyanoba Shinde v. The Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation & Ors.
The High Court allowed the appeal enhancing compensation for a disabled claimant forced to take voluntary retirement due to accident injuries, awarding loss of income, future prospects, and other damages.
Raj Kamal Yadav & Anr. v. Manju Yadav
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against distant relatives in a matrimonial dispute due to vague allegations and abuse of process, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC despite statutory bars.
Arman Mohd v. State, Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner found unknowingly in possession of a single cartridge, holding that mere possession without knowledge and complementary parts does not constitute an offence.
Manku Vanshkar and Ors v. National Insurance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the exclusion of a married daughter from financial dependency for compensation calculation but enhanced the interest rate awarded on the compensation from 6% to 8% per annum.
Union of India v. M/S. Wishwa Mittar Bajaj and Sons & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a non-speaking arbitral award lacking adequate reasoning under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, reaffirming the necessity of reasoned awards in arbitration.
Union of India v. M/S ERA CONSTRUCTION (INDIA) LTD
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for lack of reasoning and disregard of contractual terms, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Shri Sheetal Dawer v. M/S Moda Cocktail & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute under DIAC rules.
Cargill Incorporated v. The Registrar of Trade Marks
The Delhi High Court set aside the Registrar's refusal to register the trade mark 'TOPCITHIN' for failure to consider prior use and pending rectification, remanding the application for fresh examination.
Sheikh Intaz @ Sheikh Imtyaz v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 397 IPC due to lack of credible evidence of use of a deadly weapon but upheld other convictions, modifying the sentence to the period already served.
Sardar Sarabjit Singh Bedi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner for the estate of the deceased under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, affirming that such grant authorizes estate administration but does not confer ownership.
Banwarilal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF constable for assisting cattle smugglers, ruling that judicial interference in disciplinary proceedings is limited to cases of manifest perversity or procedural violations.
Neha Dutta v. Commissioner of Police
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking FIR registration against police officials, holding that alternate remedies under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. must be exhausted before approaching the High Court.
H D F C ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. RAMJI & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld motor accident compensation awards, holding the insurer liable due to failure to prove violation of insurance policy by producing vehicle permit or proof of legal notice service.
Tata 1MG Healthcare Solutions Private Limited v. QRG Medicare Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of the arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator accordingly, leaving merits and frivolity issues to the arbitral tribunal.
Tata 1Mg Healthcare Solutions Private Limited v. North East Health Care Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes under the collaboration agreement.
Tata 1MG Healthcare Solutions Private Limited v. Marengo Asia Healthcare Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, judicial scrutiny is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes under the Collaboration Agreement.
Azad Market RWA (Regd.) v. Mamta Yadav
Delhi High Court dismissed petitions filed by Azad Market RWA for unauthorized construction due to abuse of process, suppression of facts, and lack of locus standi, imposing costs and referring counsel for disciplinary action.