Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful withdrawal of relaxation granted under the PF Scheme to MTNL due to financial losses, affirming that conditions in the Scheme apply automatically and are intra vires the PF Act.
Kirori Mal College v. Dr Kusum Lata
The Delhi High Court held that reservation for physically handicapped candidates must be implemented in teaching posts with seniority and benefits relating back to the first reserved vacancy, modifying the date of actual monetary benefits.
Prof. Sachin Maheshwari v. Netaji Subhas University of Technology
The Delhi High Court refused interim relief to restrain the Vice-Chancellor of Netaji Subhas University of Technology from functioning, holding that allegations against him were prima facie unfounded and the appointment was not shown to be arbitrary.
Munni Devi & Anr. v. Mahi Pal Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that appellants failed to prove title over the property due to non-examination of principals and attesting witnesses, and upheld the lower courts' concurrent findings without reappreciation of evidence.
Ravinder Kaur Sethi & Anr. v. Surinder Kaur
The Delhi High Court held that a Special Power of Attorney holder cannot lead evidence as attorney in arbitration but may depose personally if privy to facts, and disposed of the petition regulating the capacity in which evidence is led.
Sunder Bidhuri v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of a PIL seeking construction of a park and sports complex on public land by directing authorities to consider the petition as a representation subject to administrative feasibility and funds availability.
Puttam v. Dept. of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's grievances and take prompt action to ensure effective implementation of JSY, JSSK, and PMMVY welfare schemes in Mansarovar Park.
Naima Pallabi v. Department of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed authorities to consider the petitioner's representations regarding adolescent health clinics under the RKSK scheme and take appropriate action, disposing of the writ petition without issuing mandamus.
Daya Nand Chandela v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application to suspend his conviction under Sections 452/307 IPC, holding that no exceptional circumstances exist to override election disqualification under Section 8(3) of the Representation of the People Act.
China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrator's order excluding non-notified claims from arbitration under the contract, affirming that only notified claims included in the final bill are arbitrable.
Anushree Moheopathic Medical College v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous since the petitioner was later permitted to admit students, rendering the relief sought moot.
Jagjeet Singh & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties in a matrimonial dispute.
Shaukat @ Aayan v. State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail is not granted to an accused declared a proclaimed offender under Section 82 Cr.P.C where the prosecution case is serious and there is no material to show false implication.
State of Odisha v. Ganesh Chandra Sahoo
The Supreme Court upheld the discharge of a government servant for prolonged unauthorized absence without credible medical proof, rejecting the High Court's substitution of penalty based on a belated medical certificate.
ANURADHA BHASIN v. UNION OF INDIA
The Supreme Court held that freedom of speech and trade through the internet are fundamental rights under Article 19, and imposed restrictions must be lawful, reasonable, proportionate, and transparent, directing restoration of communication services in Jammu and Kashmir.
പനീല്വഭാദത്തി v. മകരള സഠസഭാന സര്കഭാര്
The court upheld the validity of coastal reclamation permissions granted under CRZ regulations, emphasizing strict compliance with environmental safeguards and procedural requirements.
Panilvabhadathi v. Makarala Sadasabha Sarakbhar
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of CRZ regulatory actions and environmental clearances in Kerala's coastal areas, emphasizing scientific classification and procedural compliance under the CRZ regime.
Kapico Kerala Resorts Pvt. Ltd v. State of Kerala
The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala High Court's prohibition on resort construction in Nediyathuruthu island under CRZ regulations, affirming environmental protections and rejecting the appellant's challenges.
Shankar Prasad v. Uttar Pradesh State
The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, sentencing him to ten years imprisonment based on the nature of the incident and evidence.
Sankath Prasad v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court reduced the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, modifying the sentence to ten years imprisonment.