Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Seva) v. Container Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court held that interim relief applications pending before courts under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act must be referred to the Arbitral Tribunal under Section 17, and directed continuation of interim arrangements pending the Tribunal's decision.
The Irrigation & Flood Control Department v. Naresh Kumar Gupta
The High Court allowed the appeal and remitted the matter for merit consideration after condoning delay in filing objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that sufficient cause was shown for delay.
Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Supreme Court held that offences without a minimum sentence of seven years cannot be classified as heinous offences under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and directed that such offences be treated as serious offences until the Legislature decides otherwise.
Shilpa Mittal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that offences without a minimum sentence of seven years cannot be classified as heinous offences under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and directed that such offences be treated as serious offences until the Legislature acts.
Krishna Ram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court affirmed the High Courts' constitutional jurisdiction to review Armed Forces Tribunal orders under Articles 226 and 227, declaring statutory limitations excluding such jurisdiction unconstitutional, while dismissing the appellant's service-related challenge.
Balkrishna Ram v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that appeals against single judge High Court orders relating to Armed Forces personnel are not to be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming the High Court's writ jurisdiction as part of the Constitution's basic structure.
Krishna Ram v. Union of India & Ors.
The Supreme Court affirmed the High Courts' constitutional jurisdiction to exercise judicial review over Armed Forces Tribunal orders and held that appeals against single judge orders in service matters are maintainable before the High Courts.
Balkrishna Ram v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that intra-court appeals pending before a High Court against orders concerning Armed Forces personnel are not to be transferred to the Armed Forces Tribunal, affirming the High Court's writ jurisdiction as part of the Constitution's basic structure.
APEX BUILDSYS LTD. v. VADERA INTERIORS AND EXTERIORS
The Delhi High Court held that it can extend an arbitrator's mandate under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration Act even after expiry, rejecting objections based on abandonment, delay, jurisdiction, and liquidation bar.
Accurate Education & Research Society v. Bank of Maharashtra
The Delhi High Court disposed of writ petitions as infructuous following the dismissal of related appeals by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal.
PR. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi-2 v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that the Assessing Officer must strictly comply with the Tribunal's remand order to determine depreciation eligibility of electronic meters and bus bars, remanding the matter for final adjudication.
Asha Ram Gupta v. The Commissioner (Food & Supplies Department) & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that administrative discretion under the Food Supply Order to suspend or cancel FPS licences cannot be ousted by subsequent directions and set aside a suspension order that wrongly assumed no discretion remained.
Union of India v. Sir Sobha Singh & Sons P.Ltd.
The Delhi Rent Control Act applies to government leases unless expressly excluded by the grant, and non-payment of rent justifies eviction despite the Government Grants Act, 1895.
Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Filza Moonis, Adv. v. NTPC LIMITED AND ANR. ....
The Delhi High Court upheld NTPC's order banning petitioners from business dealings for three years based on grave corruption allegations despite pending arbitration, affirming the State's inherent power to blacklist subject to natural justice and limited judicial review.
Mr.Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Ms.Filza Moonis, Adv. v. NTPC LIMITED AND ANR. ....
The Delhi High Court upheld NTPC's three-year banning order against petitioners for alleged corrupt practices, holding that such administrative action is a legitimate, independently exercisable power subject to limited judicial review even during pending dispute resolution.
Anshul Rehan v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings in a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement between the parties and withdrawal of prosecution by the complainant.
Youth Hostel Association of India v. Youth Hostel Association of India, Haryana State Branch
The Delhi High Court upheld interim relief allowing participation in YHAI elections despite derecognition of the State Branch, directing supervised elections within six months to prevent indefinite continuation of office bearers.
M/S. UBV INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. v. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award that upheld contract termination for forged bank guarantees and allowed recovery of 20% of uncompleted work value, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration awards.
S.A.R.E. Public Company Ltd. v. Avon Infracon Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that subsidiaries are not bound by a negative covenant in a Purchase Agreement executed solely by the holding company absent clear privity, and declined to restrain them from encumbering their assets based on that agreement.
Kush Kalra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking a writ directing DMRC to provide free drinking water and toilet facilities at all Metro Stations, holding such matters to be policy decisions not warranting judicial interference.