Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Kamlesh v. Union of India
The Supreme Court held that a provisional appointment does not confer any right to regularization or back wages, dismissing the appellant’s claim and permitting her to hold the post only until regular appointment is made.
Yashistha Sahu v. Rajasthan State and Others
The Supreme Court upheld the Rajasthan High Court’s order directing the wife to return the child to the USA, emphasizing the child's best interests and respect for foreign custody orders in cross-border disputes.
Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan
The Supreme Court held that in international child custody disputes, the child's welfare is paramount, foreign court orders are persuasive but not binding, and issued directions balancing custody and visitation rights while rejecting coercive orders against an adult spouse.
Yashita Sahu v. Rajasthan State
The Supreme Court upheld the maintainability of a habeas corpus petition in a cross-border child custody dispute, emphasizing the child's best interests and directing interim custody and visitation arrangements pending foreign court orders.
Yashita Sahu v. State of Rajasthan
The Supreme Court held that in international child custody disputes, the child's welfare prevails over foreign court orders and directed custody and visitation arrangements balancing parental rights and the child's best interests.
M/S FAIR COMMUNICATION AND CONSULTANTS & ANR v. SURENDRA KERDILE
The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for recovery of ₹80,000 loan, rejecting the appellants' benami and evidentiary objections and affirming the burden of proof on benami claims.
Pawan Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that once a plea of juvenility is conclusively rejected by all courts including the Supreme Court, it cannot be re-agitated by filing a fresh application under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice Act.
Pawan Kumar Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Supreme Court held that once a plea of juvenility is conclusively rejected by all courts including the Supreme Court, it cannot be re-agitated by filing a fresh application under Section 7A of the Juvenile Justice Act.
Shashi Bhusan Kumar Yadav v. Rakesh Cine Media Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s suit for declaration regarding an agreement due to absence of cause of action and failure to challenge the agreement’s validity.
Nand Kishore Garg v. Jitender Singh Tomar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the election of respondent no.1 for submitting false educational qualifications and committing corrupt practice under the Representation of the People Act, 1951.
Kuldeep Singh Sengar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Delhi High Court admitted the criminal appeal against conviction under Section 376(2) IPC, extended time for fine payment, ordered immediate victim compensation release, and dismissed bail application as withdrawn.
Shiv Charan v. Raj Kumar & Ors
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident appeal by granting 25% addition towards loss of future prospects for a 40% functional disability of the right upper limb, modifying the compensation awarded by the MACT.
KARL STORZ ENDOSCOPY INDIA PVT LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the award of a medical equipment tender, holding that minor bid deviations were justified and the tender process was fair and free from arbitrariness.
Rajinder Prasad Aggarwal v. Dr. Anil Kumar Narang
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance due to the plaintiff's failure to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract and held that such failure disentitles the plaintiff to relief under Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Ranchi
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a delayed appeal under the EPF Act, holding that vague administrative reasons do not constitute sufficient cause to condone an inordinate delay beyond the statutory limitation period.
Rex (U. & A.) Remedies Pvt Ltd v. Govt of State of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a 2000 land acquisition notification due to inordinate delay and laches, reaffirming that stale claims cannot be revived under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.
Narender Singh & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's withdrawal of prosecution.
Rajiv Puri v. Jagdish Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that subsequent facts arising after filing a leave to defend application in eviction proceedings can be admitted by affidavit and considered by the Rent Controller to ensure just adjudication, subject to strict scrutiny and timely disposal.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pawan Kumar Sinha
The Delhi High Court held that a valid LMV driving licence authorizes driving certain commercial vehicles, making the insurer liable to pay compensation despite the driver lacking a specific commercial vehicle licence.
New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Virender Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld insurer liability for compensation where the vehicle owner had verified the driver's license and competence before employment, applying the principle from United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Lehru.