Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Dr. Vinay Aggarwal and Anr. v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the election notification for Delhi Medical Council members, holding that the term of office runs from the original gazette notification date and that a nominated member cannot challenge elections for elected members.
Amit Mukharjee & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
Delhi High Court held that employees of exempted establishments are entitled to pension benefits based on actual salary contributions without ceiling limits, quashing discriminatory circulars, subject to Supreme Court's final decision.
Preeti Sharma & Anr v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of legal heirs seeking alternative plot allotment based on an expired lease and non-binding committee recommendations, upholding the DDA's rejection and prior Supreme Court rulings.
Union of India and Ors. v. Mridula Gupta; Union of India and Ors. v. Neeru Singhal
The Delhi High Court upheld CAT orders directing the Ministry of Defence to grant re-designation and one-time promotion benefits to employees in the Programmer cadre as per the MOD letter dated 6th December 1994, distinguishing this from the Supreme Court's ruling on DEO posts.
Julli Singh Pradhan & Anr. v. Veena Thandani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the respondent's ownership and possession rights, holding that unregistered and unproved documents cannot confer title or tenancy rights.
MAA TARINI INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR. v. PEC LIMITED
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. challenging proceedings under Section 138 NI Act, holding that inherent jurisdiction cannot be used as a substitute for barred revision and that the demand notice was not defective.
Mohd Usman v. Subhash Chand
The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in the date of its judgment by issuing a corrigendum to maintain accuracy in the judicial record.
Tathagat Exports Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. PEC Limited
The High Court dismissed the petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. holding that the demand notice was not defective and that the petitioners cannot seek quashing of the complaint after availing revision remedy, emphasizing that defences must be raised during trial under the special procedure of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
M/S MEHNDIRATTA & ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. v. SHRI GOPAL GOVERDHAN GAUSHALA & ANR
The Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award, regularizing the interim period.
SONA CORPORATION INDIA PVT. LTD. v. INGRAM MICRO INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's discretion to recall its interim order and require alternate security when the property offered was encumbered, dismissing the appellant's challenge under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. VIJAY KUMAR @ VIJAY BAHADUR & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that a vehicle with unladen weight below 7,500 kgs is a light motor vehicle under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the insurer is not entitled to recover compensation from the vehicle owner when the driver holds a valid licence.
Minesh Chopra v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, from a panel agreed upon by the parties to adjudicate their disputes.
Samsung India Electronics Private Ltd. v. Kings Electronics Pvt Ltd.
Delhi High Court granted a six-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 despite respondent's ex-parte status and non-appearance.
Rashmi Pal v. The State (Govt. N.C.T. Delhi) and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical negligence findings by the Delhi Medical Council, holding that expert medical opinions cannot be interfered with absent perversity or unreasonableness.
The State v. Ramji Ram
The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a kidnapping and rape case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the victim was a minor or that sexual relations were non-consensual.
Sardool Singh and Ors. v. Surjeet Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered General Power of Attorney and Will executed by the deceased owner, dismissing the appellants' suit alleging forgery and affirming the respondents' ownership of the disputed property.
Siemens Ltd. v. Jindal India Thermal Power Limited
The Delhi High Court granted a nine-month extension for completion of arbitral proceedings and passing of the award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 on the joint request of the parties citing technical complexity and voluminous records.
Minesh Chopra v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, from a panel proposed by the respondent, to adjudicate disputes between the parties.
Anil Gera v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings based on an amicable settlement between parties and the complainant's no objection to prosecution.
Sudarshan Kukreti v. Phool Wati
The High Court dismissed the revision petition against eviction under bona fide necessity after the petitioner undertook to vacate the premises by a fixed date and pay use and occupation charges, staying execution of the eviction order accordingly.