Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vasudev v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s regularisation and pension benefits under the Old Pension Scheme must be backdated to the date of his original application, rejecting the respondents’ arbitrary fixation of a later date.
SPIRITED AUTO CAR (I) LTD. (ESPIRIT TOYOTA) v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH THE LABOUR DEPARTMENT
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s order reinstating six workmen terminated without notice, due to the petitioner’s failure to contest claims or participate in conciliation proceedings.
SPIRITED AUTO CAR (I) LTD. (ESPIRIT TOYOTA) v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH THE LABOUR DEPARTMENT
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s order reinstating six workmen terminated without notice, as the employer failed to contest the claims or participate in conciliation proceedings.
SPIRITED AUTO CAR (I) LTD. (ESPIRIT TOYOTA) v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH THE LABOUR DEPARTMENT
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's order reinstating six workmen with back wages after the employer failed to contest their unjust termination claims.
SPIRITED AUTO CAR (I) LTD. (ESPIRIT TOYOTA) v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) THROUGH THE LABOUR DEPARTMENT
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petitions and upheld the Labour Court’s order reinstating six workmen terminated without notice, due to the employer’s failure to contest the claims in conciliation and adjudicatory proceedings.
M/S Satyam Caterers Pvt. Ltd. v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple arbitration petitions by recording parties' consent to treat an existing arbitral award as governing their contracts, avoiding multiplicity of litigation and declining appointment of separate arbitrators.
Union of India v. Karam Chand
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a consent order of the Central Administrative Tribunal due to unexplained delay and upheld the binding nature of consent orders.
Kumkum Kapoor v. Sushila Devi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the eviction revision petition subject to vacating the premises by a fixed date and paying use and occupation charges, staying the eviction order accordingly.
ICCG INDIA PVT. LTD. v. PLANT LIPIDS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes over additional manpower charges under a service agreement are arbitrable and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the matter, rejecting the respondent's claim of non-arbitrability.
പപത നീൽ വാദ്തി v. മോോാസമ്മ നബെന്ന്തിയ്ി പറ്ള്ളവര്ി
The Supreme Court upheld pension benefits including increments for a retired employee under the Employees' State Insurance Act, dismissing the Union of India's appeal against the Tribunal and High Court decisions.
Union of India v. Rosamma Benny
The Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether appointments through LDCE constitute direct recruitment or promotion for MACP benefits, emphasizing the need to examine relevant service rules and circulars.
Union of India and Another v. Rosamma Benny and Others
The Supreme Court remanded the matter for fresh adjudication to determine whether employees appointed through LDCE under promotion quota are entitled to MACP benefits counting past service.
MD. ALI IMAM & ORS. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
The Supreme Court upheld the State's retrospective cut-off date for extending pensionary benefits under the Triple Benefit Scheme to employees of deficit grant colleges, ruling it was not arbitrary or discriminatory.
MD. ALI IMAM & ORS. v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
The Supreme Court upheld the State's reasonable cut-off date for extending pensionary benefits under the Triple Benefit Scheme, dismissing claims of arbitrariness and discrimination.
Union of India v. Gopaldas Bhagwan Das
The Supreme Court upheld that failure to issue mandatory public notices under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act invalidates acquisition proceedings, and delay in challenging such acquisition does not cure this defect.
Union of India v. Gopaldas Bhagwan Das
The Supreme Court upheld the invalidity of land acquisition due to non-compliance with mandatory public notice requirements under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, dismissing the appeal despite delay in challenge.
JWIL INFRA LTD. v. NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD.
The Delhi High Court granted a three-month extension for passing the arbitral award under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, on the parties' joint consent.
Shrikant Prasad v. Delhi Police
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking general directions to police on FIR registration and conduct, holding that existing laws and Supreme Court guidelines suffice and violations must be addressed in individual cases.
Indian Ex Bordermen Movement v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that ACP Scheme benefits form part of pay structure and must be granted retrospectively from January 1, 1996 to BSF personnel, overruling the DoPT's delayed implementation date.
Raj Kumar Kashyap v. Pushpender Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction orders allowing the landlord's bona fide requirement of tenanted premises for commercial and residential use, dismissing tenants' challenge and review petitions.