Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. Ram Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenants to file their written statements despite the trial court striking off their defence, emphasizing procedural fairness and the unexpired 120-day period.
Krishan Kumar v. The State
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a criminal intimidation and extortion case, holding that prima facie evidence justified denial of bail.
Aniket@Ankur Bansal v. State, Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused under Sections 420, 406, and 34 IPC, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation and non-interference with evidence.
Mr.VirenBansal,Adv v. + bailAPPLN.2680/2019
The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused persons after prolonged custody and partial trial progress, noting initial non-identification by the complainant without commenting on case merits.
Rishabh Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioners in a serious offence case on the basis of settlement and prolonged judicial custody, without commenting on the merits.
Shashm Kant Sehagal v. The Registrar Cooperative Societies, Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Rule 90 Committee to decide on the petitioners' allotment within a stipulated time and disposed of the petitions, allowing legal remedies post-decision.
Gaon Sabha Bijwasan v. Ajay Ralhan
The Court upheld that construction on agricultural land is permissible if dominant use remains agricultural and dismissed the petition as proceedings under Section 81 of the DLR Act were barred by limitation.
Pushpendra Kumar Yadav v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a CRPF Sub-Inspector for suppression of pending criminal proceedings in his verification form, affirming that nondisclosure of such material facts justifies disciplinary action.
Vaninath Uppalapati v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under the Arms Act against a petitioner found with live ammunition, holding that mere possession without conscious knowledge or intention does not constitute an offence.
Manish Wesley v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and proceedings against a broker accused of cheating due to lack of prima facie evidence and inordinate delay in filing the charge sheet.
Mukesh Kumar v. East Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging illegal construction as premature since a special task force was already investigating the matter.
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. ANUP KUMAR & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that in non-commercial disputes, courts have discretion to condone delay in filing written statements under unamended CPC provisions, allowing the DDA's appeal subject to costs.
Rohit v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a robbery and assault case, holding that serious allegations and prima facie evidence outweigh the petitioner's claims of innocence and prior acquittal.
Naunihal Singh Kakkar v. Land & Building Department
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging land acquisition under the 1948 Act, holding that Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act does not apply, unregistered agreements and power of attorney do not confer title, and stale claims barred by delay cannot be revived.
Pradyuman Overseas Ltd. v. Sanjeev Jindal
The Delhi High Court directed the Executing Court to examine the validity of a delayed settlement agreement in execution proceedings, allowing secondary evidence and emphasizing expeditious disposal.
M/S Arvind Kumar Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, rejecting the respondent's insistence on appointing its own officer and refusing to compel waiver of Section 12(5) disqualification.
Jaswin Arora v. Harmeet Singh Sood & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the impleadment of subsequent purchasers as necessary parties in a suit for specific performance to ensure effective adjudication and dismissed the appeal challenging interim orders including removal of a litigation signboard.
Association of Health Care Providers (India) v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging contractual deductions under CGHS, holding that disputes with arbitration clauses must be resolved through arbitration, not writ jurisdiction.
Ravi Kumar & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and consequent criminal proceedings following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's decision not to prosecute further.
The Indian Newspaper Society v. The Chairman, Press Council of India
The Delhi High Court held that a whole-time director of a company owning a newspaper can be eligible for nomination to the Press Council of India under Section 5(3)(b) of the Press Council Act, 1978, and remanded the matter for reconsideration of eligibility based on relevant material.