M/S Satyam Caterers Pvt. Ltd. v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited

Delhi High Court · 04 Feb 2020 · 2020:DHC:793
Jyoti Singh
Arb. Pet. 104/2020
2020:DHC:793
arbitration appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple arbitration petitions by recording parties' consent to treat an existing arbitral award as governing their contracts, avoiding multiplicity of litigation and declining appointment of separate arbitrators.

Full Text
Translation output
Arb. Pet.104/2020 & conn.
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 04.02.2020
ARB.P. 104/2020 and IA 1552/2020
M/S SATYAM CATERERS PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi, Mr.Umang Raj and Mr. Anurag Sarda, Advocates
VERSUS
INDIAN RAILWAY CATERING AND TOURISM CORPORATION LIMITED (IRCTC) ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Nikhil Majithia, Standing counsel
ARB.P. 88/2020
M/S BRANDAVAN FOOD PRODUCTS ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
ARB.P. 89/2020
VERSUS
2020:DHC:793
ARB.P. 90/2020
M/S ROOP CATERERS. ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
ARB.P. 91/2020
VERSUS
ARB.P. 92/2020
VERSUS
ARB.P. 93/2020
VERSUS
ARB.P. 94/2020
VERSUS
ARB.P. 95/2020
R. K. ASSOCIATES AND HOTELIERS PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
ARB.P. 96/2020
VERSUS
CORPORATION LIMITED(IRCTC) ..... Respondent
ARB.P. 97/2020
M/S ROOP CATERERS. ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
ARB.P. 98/2020
VERSUS
ARB.P. 99/2020
VERSUS
ARB.P. 100/2020
VERSUS
ARB.P. 101/2020
R. K. ASSOCIATES AND HOTELIERS PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
VERSUS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J. (ORAL)
JUDGMENT

1. Mr. Majithia, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, submits that since similar matters are being adjudicated by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted pursuant to the order of this Court in Arb. Petitions Nos. 745/2019 and other connected matters, decided on 11.12.2019, respondent has taken a decision that the Award passed in those proceedings would be treated as an Award, with respect to the contracts which are subject matter of these petitions, so as to avoid multiplicity of litigation.

2. Mr. Bishnoi, learned counsel for the petitioners has sought instruction on this aspect from the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners are willing to accept this course of action and would treat the Award that would be passed in the pending proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal as an Award, for the contracts in the present cases.

3. With the consent of the parties, the present petitions are disposed of recording the undertakings as above. Since the parties have consented as above and the Award passed in similar cases being adjudicated by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted by Justice Swatanter Kumar, former Judge of Supreme Court of India would be an Award governing the present contracts, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petitions for appointment of a separate Arbitrator. Needless to state, that the parties shall be at liberty to take recourse to remedies available to them in law against the Award so passed.

4. The petitions and the application filed herewith are disposed of in the above terms.

JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 04, 2020/yg /