Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
PUMA SE v. D.K. ARORA
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint alleging trade mark infringement must not be rejected under Order VII Rule 10 CPC if it discloses a cause of action within territorial jurisdiction, and set aside the order returning the plaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Asif Raza Khan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for pension restoration based on a 55% disability certificate as a representation and decide it within a stipulated time.
Phool Singh @ Phool Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall a mentally disabled child victim for cross-examination after a three-year delay, balancing the accused's fair trial rights with POCSO Act protections.
Manoj Kumar Bisht v. Ankit Somani
The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed through a power of attorney holder is maintainable even without specific averment of personal knowledge, and the competency of the attorney is to be tested at trial, not at summoning.
Swiss Bike Vertrjevs Gmbh Subsidiary of Accell Group v. Imperial Cycle Meg. Co.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark 'RALLIES' for bicycles due to its deceptive similarity with the plaintiff's registered trademark 'RALEIGH', allowing limited time to clear existing stock.
Shri Narender Kumar Gulati v. V.K. Gulati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition of a property held benami, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove the property was held in trust and that the suit was barred under the Benami Property Act.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. PEC Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling that CSR expenditure incurred before assessment year 2015-16 is deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, as the amendment excluding such expenses is prospective.
Pallab Chakraborty v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application after chargesheet filing, directing the petitioner to seek regular bail before the trial court.
Supertech Realtors Private Limited v. Bank of Maharashtra
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition cannot be used to alter the terms of a One-Time Settlement contract, affirming that the moratorium period must be calculated from the original sanction date and dismissing the appellant's appeal.
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited v. Deepak Cables (India) Limited (In Liq)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sole Arbitrator's right to revise arbitration fees under the Fourth Schedule after stay of multiple arbitration proceedings, dismissing the petition seeking termination of his mandate.
Raj Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the accused in a serious economic offence involving illegal gratification, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and thorough investigation.
Naveen alias Akshay v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354A, and 506 IPC after the complainant married the accused and they were living together peacefully without coercion.
Smt Madhu v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of investigation into a death alleged to be murder, holding the police inquiry was adequate and no foul play was established.
Bhimrao Jagannath Koli v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court acquitted a physically handicapped appellant of attempt to murder charges due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
D.S. Karant v. Union of India
The Bombay High Court upheld the disciplinary charges against an IRS officer but modified the penalty to reduce him by one rank instead of two, ensuring proportionality and adherence to natural justice.
In Re Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra)
The Supreme Court permitted MMRCL to seek permission for felling 84 trees at Aarey for the Metro Car Depot, upheld the State Government's decision to proceed with the project, and emphasized the Tree Authority's independent role in balancing development and environmental concerns.
Suneetha Narreddy v. The Central Bureau of Investigation
The Supreme Court transferred the trial of the murder of Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy from Andhra Pradesh to Hyderabad, holding that a reasonable apprehension of bias and threats justified ensuring a fair and impartial trial.
Suneetha Narreddy v. The Central Bureau of Investigation
The Supreme Court transferred the trial of the murder case of Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy from Andhra Pradesh to Hyderabad, holding that reasonable apprehension of unfair trial due to threats and interference justified the transfer to ensure a free and fair trial.
Mukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing enforcement of pharmacy regulations to prevent unauthorized persons from dispensing medicines and protect public health.
Sansera Engineering Limited v. Deputy Commissioner, Large Taxpayer Unit, Bengaluru
The Supreme Court held that the one-year limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act applies to rebate claims under Rule 18, dismissing the appellant's time-barred rebate claims.