Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Mukesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and remanded the public interest litigation for fresh consideration, directing strict enforcement of pharmacy regulations to protect public health.
Sansera Engineering Limited v. Deputy Commissioner, Large Tax Payer Unit, Bengaluru
The Supreme Court held that rebate claims under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, are subject to the one-year limitation period prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and claims beyond this period are barred.
M/S Jansevak Textile Mill v. Chanchal Trading Company
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by directing release of fixed deposit amounts to the parties as per their amicable settlement.
Ms. Shreeya Sud v. Aman Singh
The Delhi High Court held that while courts generally defer to expert medical boards in police recruitment, a re-review medical examination may be directed on individual merits where procedural irregularities or injustice are shown, and such re-review shall be final and binding.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Anil Luthra
Failure to exercise option to continue under CPF within stipulated time results in automatic inclusion in Pension Scheme, and acceptance of CPF benefits thereafter does not bar pension entitlement.
Madhu Jain v. Shashi Rani
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the ground of the landlady's bona fide requirement of the premises for conducting tutorial classes post-retirement, affirming the Rent Controller's order and limiting revisional interference.
Sh. Ranjeet Kumar Ram v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the railway is strictly liable to compensate a bona fide passenger injured in an untoward incident, even if contributory negligence is present, and remanded the claim for compensation.
Bennett, Coleman and Company Limited v. E1 Entertainment Television, LLC and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a rectification petition against a trademark registration is maintainable independently if the trademark is not the subject matter of any pending suit and no invalidity defense under Section 30(2)(e) is pleaded, dismissing the respondent's application to reject the petition.
Sanjeev Kumar v. Mohammad Mobeen and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the penalty imposed on an employer under the Employees’ Compensation Act for failure to timely submit the claim form to the insurer, affirming the limited scope of appeals under Section 30 of the Act.
Punjab National Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal against interim orders under PMLA, directing the tribunal to consider the appellant's case expeditiously without commenting on merits.
Kapil Goel v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the suspension of a Resolution Professional for misusing the name 'IBBI' in his private firm, upholding the disciplinary action under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and IBBI Regulations.
National Highways Authority of India v. M/S Suncon Soma (JV)
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting compensation exceeding the DRB recommendation, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration and the non-binding nature of DRB recommendations when arbitration is initiated.
Pooja Kumar v. Mohit Kumar
The Delhi High Court held the respondent guilty of wilful contempt for non-payment of maintenance despite a binding court order and pending appeal without stay.
Ilashree Nath Gupta v. Kamla Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that a legal heir cannot file a fresh leave to defend application in eviction proceedings after the original tenant's death and dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of such application.
Rajeev Kumar Garg v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court condoned the delay caused by the COVID-19 pandemic in filing an insurance agent's reinstatement application and directed LIC to consider it on merits within the prescribed time.
Sanjay & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a bona fide settlement reached during divorce proceedings and the complainant's voluntary no-objection statement.
Sh. Ajay Kumar and Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a valid train ticket establishes bona fide passenger status and an untoward incident under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, condoned delay in filing appeal, and remanded the matter for compensation.
Anil Kumar Sharma v. Kamlesh Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC for lack of cause of action against defendants 1 and 2, holding that the alleged oral agreement was only between the plaintiff and defendant 3 who lacked authority to bind them.
Ramesh Kaushik v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC due to irretrievable loss of the Trial Court Record, affirming that fair appellate adjudication is impossible without complete records.
Rajni Nagpal v. Reeta Bhayana
The Delhi High Court granted the petitioner a final opportunity to lead evidence subject to costs, setting aside dismissal of witness summoning application, emphasizing balancing procedural discipline with fair trial.