Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Web Overseas Limited v. Universal Industrial Plants Manufacturing Company Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that time spent pursuing a Section 8 application does not exclude limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act and that legal notices not requesting arbitration do not qualify as Section 21 notices, setting aside an arbitral award allowing a counter-claim filed beyond limitation.
Yadvinder Singh v. Neha Singh
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to examine witnesses in family court proceedings subject to costs and strict timelines, emphasizing the right to lead evidence and procedural discipline.
Taurus Englobe Pvt. Ltd. v. Bhavin R Shah
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's challenge to jurisdiction and upheld the trial court's decree for payment, holding that partial cause of action within jurisdiction and presence of registered office confer jurisdiction.
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India v. State Bank of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the NCLT lacks jurisdiction to declare IBBI regulations ultra vires and set aside the NCLT order invalidating Regulation 36A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Regulations.
Nitin Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of allegations in a matrimonial dispute.
Union of India v. Bishan Singh
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order directing regularization of a worker without formal appointment, holding that identity cards and daily wages do not confer a right to regularization absent appointment against a sanctioned post.
Zishan Mukhtar Hussain Siddique v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court quashed an FIR and charge-sheet under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act for malafide invocation, holding that taking photos of a complaint inside a police station does not constitute spying or an offence under the Act.
Vijay Subhash Kore v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court set aside a preventive detention order due to unreasonable delay by the detaining authority in deciding the petitioner's representation, violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution.
Mukesh Kumar Mittal v. Vimlesh Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that a review petition seeking revival of an interlocutory application for use and occupation charges after dismissal of the main revision petition is not maintainable and dismissed the review petition.
Ramesh Chandra Gupta v. State of U.P. & Ors.
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants in a family property dispute, holding that the allegations did not prima facie constitute offences and the prosecution was an abuse of process.
Ramesh Chandra Gupta v. State of U.P. & Ors.
The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against appellants where allegations did not prima facie constitute an offence and were instituted with mala fide to harass, affirming the High Court's inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Rashmi Dixit v. Medical Council of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry into medical negligence and false representation of qualifications by a doctor, emphasizing that misrepresentation of specialization presumes deficiency in medical service.
Neelam Kumari & Ors. v. M/s The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a second compensation claim application under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, holding that withdrawal of the first claim does not bar a fresh claim and emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders.
Make My Trip (India) Private Limited v. Owners of www.makemytripmood.com & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of MakeMyTrip, permanently restraining defendants from using a deceptively similar domain name and marks, holding that domain names enjoy trademark protection and summary judgment is appropriate where defendants fail to contest.
Jai Shree Holidays and Tours Pvt Ltd v. Prakash Verma
The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of Respondent 4 from the suit under Order I Rule 10 CPC, holding that mere signature as a witness does not establish guarantor liability and that the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited.
Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Tosh Apartments Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the nullity of sale deeds executed in violation of injunction orders, reaffirming the Supreme Court's prior adjudication and the principle of res judicata.
Anand Jindal v. Dharampal Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner limited opportunity to examine a material defence witness despite closure of his defence evidence due to repeated adjournments without credible medical proof, emphasizing the need for timely production of medical documents and preventing abuse of process.
Ved Prakash v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the enhanced compensation awarded to landowners for land acquired for the Mass Rapid Transit System, rejecting the Union of India's appeal to reduce the market value and affirming entitlement to solatium and interest.
DR B L KAPUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) DELHI 1 & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the 20% deposit condition for stay of tax demand under Section 201(1) is directory, set aside non-speaking orders rejecting stay, and remanded for fresh hearing considering key legal principles.
Darshan Lal v. Union of India and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's non-speaking order on pay fixation and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with a speaking order.