Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
AMD Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Trade Tax, Lucknow & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that trade tax exemption under Rule 4-C(5) requires production of goods of a different nature, and mere modernization or improved quality does not qualify as diversification.
AMD Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Trade Tax
The Supreme Court held that manufacturing improved goods using modern technology does not amount to diversification under Section 4-A(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, denying trade tax exemption claimed by the appellant.
Namita Gupta v. Suraj Holdings Limited
The Delhi High Court held that Section 24 CPC applies to suits relating to commercial disputes and that only the High Court can transfer such suits to Commercial Courts, setting aside unauthorized transfers by lower courts and directing transfer under Section 24 CPC to preserve proceedings.
Novartis AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the interlocutory injunction restraining Natco Pharma from exploiting Novartis's patent on Ceritinib, rejecting the defendant's plea to vacate the injunction based on non-disclosure of a refused Divisional Application.
Bijender@Vishnu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted parole to a life-convict to file a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, affirming the right of a convict to pursue legal remedies through counsel of choice under the Delhi Prisons Rules.
Deepti Kavit Ved v. District Collector Borivali & Anr.
The Bombay High Court held that the limitation period for refund of stamp duty is extended due to the Covid-19 pandemic as per Supreme Court directions, quashing the Collector's rejection and directing reconsideration of the refund claim.
Eknath Dada Thorat v. State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that a caste certificate scrutiny committee's decision must be signed by all members as mandated by Supreme Court directions and Government Resolution, quashing a decision signed by only two members and remanding for fresh consideration.
Delhi Government v. Om Prakash & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act with possession taken and compensation tendered prior to 2014 do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, setting aside the High Court's contrary order.
Delhi Government v. Om Prakash & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition proceedings do not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if either possession has been taken or compensation has been paid, setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.
Caprico International PTE Ltd v. Commissioner of Customs and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that when an importer abandons goods and ownership passes to the supplier, the supplier can clear the goods upon paying customs duty and interest but is liable for a proportionate share of demurrage charges incurred due to delay.
Baby Suhani Kapoor v. Directorate of Education
The Delhi High Court allowed a petition directing admission for a student with medical and financial challenges in 11th Class for the next academic session, rejecting late admission in the current year.
M/S V-GUARD INDUSTRIES LTD v. THE REGISTRAR OF TRADEMARKS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside the order deeming trademark opposition abandoned due to late filing of evidence caused by technical failure, emphasizing liberal interpretation of procedural rules to protect substantive rights.
Mr. Nishant Solanki, Advocate. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....
The Delhi High Court directed issuance of police clearance certificate to a petitioner acquitted in criminal proceedings and divorced, rejecting withholding based on prior pending cases.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. M/S Steel Authority of India Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal and held that CSR expenditure incurred prior to the Finance Act 2014 amendment is deductible under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, as Explanation 2 applies prospectively and such expenditure is not capital in nature.
Amarpal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India through Secretary MHA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF authorities to decide the petitioners' pending representation regarding Training Allowance within a stipulated time and communicate the decision in writing.
Jitin Prakash v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the National Commission for Scheduled Castes to expedite its inquiry into the petitioner's discrimination complaint and dismissed the writ petition without commenting on merits.
Shyam Ali v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld removal of a security force recruit for false declaration of pending criminal case despite subsequent acquittal, emphasizing integrity requirements and procedural propriety during recruitment.
Suman v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed provisional recognition of the petitioner as spouse of respondent no.3 for ex-servicemen benefits despite matrimonial dispute, subject to completion of formalities and without respondent’s cooperation.
Dr. Shilpi Agarwal & Anr. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of promotion to petitioners under the DACP Scheme due to non-fulfillment of performance benchmarks, affirming that promotion is contingent on eligibility criteria and not a matter of right.
Tej Singh v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court quashed disciplinary penalty and recovery imposed on an FCI employee for storage losses, holding that procedural lapses and lack of evidence of his liability warranted setting aside the orders.