Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Sirajudheen v. Zeenath & Ors.
The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in remanding a suit for de novo trial without recording reasons to justify reversal of the Trial Court's dismissal of a suit for cancellation of a sale deed.
Bharatiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor v. Gujarat State and Others
The Supreme Court held that a resignation withdrawn before acceptance is legally ineffective, entitling the employee to continuous service benefits and pension, setting aside contrary government orders.
Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court held that a resignation withdrawn before acceptance is ineffective, entitling the employee to continuity of service and pension benefits without unlawful deductions.
Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor v. Gujarat State and Others
The Supreme Court held that an operative resignation excludes service benefits for that period, unauthorized absence cannot count towards pension, and directed pension arrears to be paid with interest after calculating qualifying service excluding such periods.
Bhartiben Chandrakantbhai Thakor v. State of Gujarat
The Supreme Court held that a resignation withdrawn before acceptance is ineffective, entitling the employee to continuity of service and full pension benefits, setting aside inconsistent administrative orders.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking restoration of original names of historical places renamed by foreign invaders, holding that such relief conflicts with the constitutional principles of secularism, rule of law, and national integration.
Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India
The Supreme Court dismissed the petition seeking restoration of original names of places renamed by foreign invaders, holding that such relief conflicts with constitutional secularism, equality, and fraternity principles.
Aman Nimi-Kadki v. Haryana Raj Audyogik Siksha Sangam
The court upheld dismissal of the appellant's application for resumption of industrial dispute proceedings due to non-compliance with settlement terms and ordered recovery of dues.
Aman Nimi-Kadki v. Haryana Raj Audyogik Siksha Sangam
The High Court upheld the lawful cancellation of an industrial allotment by HSIDC due to the appellant's failure to comply with stipulated conditions and rejected the appellant's plea for resumption and relief.
AMAN SEMI-CONDUCTORS (PVT.) LTD. v. HARYANA STATE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD.
The Supreme Court upheld the resumption of an industrial plot due to the allottee's failure to commence construction within the stipulated period, affirming the validity of contractual conditions and the allotting authority's right to resume the plot after due opportunity.
Bhaskar Mahipat Pavale v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
The Bombay High Court held that disputes regarding apportionment of compensation under the MIDC Act must be referred to the prescribed authority and set aside the SDO's order disbursing compensation without such referral.
410fca1919e754344e5f11c513f42ac1a7f5e4ac2475e35212f678c133dc67dd
The Karnataka High Court upheld the validity of proceedings and penalties under Sections 79 and 80 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, dismissing the petition challenging them for lack of procedural infirmity.
Piyush Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment after finding the petitioner was not in the merit list and the appointment letter was issued inadvertently.
Aditya Bagree & Ors. v. National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission & Anr.
Delhi High Court directs the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission to expeditiously dispose of a pending consumer complaint delayed due to frivolous applications by the respondent.
Zeeshan Qamar v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 43D(2)(b) UAPA, extension of detention beyond 90 days requires court satisfaction with the Public Prosecutor’s report but the report need not be supplied to the accused, and extensions can be granted in truncated periods with due judicial scrutiny.
Kuber Planters Limited v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the revenue to furnish the approval order under Section 151 before proceeding with reassessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Mizha Siddeeque & Anr. v. National Investigation Agency
The document is a brief order entry referencing another case for detailed orders and does not contain substantive judgment content.
Rakesh Kumar Sharma v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending promotion representations in accordance with a prior court order within a stipulated time, allowing further challenge if aggrieved.
Brilliant Etoile Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed MCD to revalidate a sanctioned building plan, holding that consolidation proceedings had attained finality and administrative delay was unjustified.
Col. Ajeet Pal Singh v. A.K. Vashistha
The Delhi High Court allowed the application to take the respondent's written statement on record under Section 151 CPC, directing the trial court to proceed in accordance with law, relying on Supreme Court precedents permitting such acceptance subject to conditions.