Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
M/S Parity Infotech Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that blocking Input Tax Credit without tangible reasons and issuing show cause notices mechanically under Section 74 CGST Act violates statutory provisions and quashed the impugned orders and instructions.
Shivedesh Sharma & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking enforcement of EWS reservation in recruitment as not maintainable, directing petitioners to approach the appropriate forum.
HDFC Bank Ltd v. Tour N Travel India
The Delhi High Court held that a Trial Court cannot close a party's right to lead evidence without reasons and granted a final opportunity to the petitioner to examine one witness subject to costs.
Brijesh Kumar Agarwal and Ors. v. IFCI Factors Limited and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside a suo moto summary judgment in a commercial summary suit, holding that summary judgment under Order XIII-A CPC does not apply to suits originally filed under Order XXXVII and emphasizing strict compliance with procedural safeguards.
Babita & Ors. v. Sh Krishan Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the motor accident claim for fresh adjudication, holding that a disputed settlement signed under mistaken belief does not bar compensation claims by the widow and minor children.
CT.(GD) Sudhir Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed examination of a key witness before considering leave during a departmental inquiry and disposed of the writ petition challenging suspension and leave denial.
Ajit Kumar Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition seeking pension and retirement benefits after respondents stated all dues were paid, granting liberty to the petitioner's legal heirs to approach respondents if any dues remain.
Malavika Siddhartha Hegde & Ors. v. Naresh Nagpal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral tribunal's interim order restraining heirs from alienating assets, holding that the disputed MOU constituted a valid spot delivery contract and not an illegal forward contract under the Securities Contracts Regulation Act.
Sohan Lal Sharma v. Shiv Mandir & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously dispose of the interim injunction application to prevent dispossession and ensure the suit's remedy is not rendered futile.
Ruksana Bano & Ors. v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte vesting order under the DLR Act as without jurisdiction after the land was urbanized by DDA notification, holding such orders violate natural justice and are nullities.
Public Work Department v. Mukesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by the non-extendable 120-day limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Delhi Police v. Mahesh Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld that the 2% ex-Servicemen reservation under Tripura Recruitment Rules applies to total vacancies as a horizontal reservation, entitling the sole ex-Serviceman candidate to appointment.
Kapil & Ors. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections following an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of process.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Vipin Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that sexual intercourse with a minor under 18 years constitutes rape irrespective of consent, ordered framing of charges under IPC Section 376 and POCSO Act Section 4, but quashed kidnapping charges due to lack of inducement.
Joginder Chadha v. Vishnu Kumar & Ors.
Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to lead evidence post-pandemic with conditions, emphasizing leniency during COVID-19 but upholding procedural discipline thereafter.
Sunil Kumar v. Som Nath & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the employer’s appeal under Section 30 of the Employees’ Compensation Act, upholding the award of death compensation to the deceased worker’s claimant, emphasizing the limited scope of appeal to substantial questions of law.
Rahul Dayaram Bhashakar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF authority to decide the petitioner's pending representation on seniority correction within eight weeks and disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Rikon Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by recording a binding settlement wherein the defendant ceased use of infringing marks and acknowledged the plaintiff's exclusive rights.
Bhoop Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld that the 3rd MACP under the MACP scheme is payable only after 30 years of service, dismissing the petitioner's claim for earlier benefit based on withdrawn departmental clarifications.
Sanjeev Kakar v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR under Section 406 IPC, holding that a prima facie case of criminal breach of trust was made out against the petitioner for retaining company property after resignation.