Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anil Purshottam Sharma v. Monica Jignesh Parekh
The High Court held the truck driver solely negligent for a night-time expressway accident due to improper parking without hazard signals, reduced excessive compensation awarded by the Tribunal, and enhanced the claimants' compensation accordingly.
Smt. Bindu Devi & Ors. v. Chandan Upadhyay & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced loss of consortium compensation per Supreme Court precedent but upheld the Tribunal's calculation of financial dependency based on the deceased's Bihar residence due to lack of contrary evidence.
Sandeep Tilwani v. State of NCT
Bail application of accused charged with cheating and forgery involving fake telegraphic transfers was dismissed due to grave allegations and flight risk evidenced by habitual offending and multiple passports.
Annanya Yaduvanshi v. Central Board of Secondary Education
Delhi High Court directed CBSE to consider a disabled student's request for compensatory time on merits despite procedural delay, emphasizing substantive rights over technicalities.
PCIT-07, DELHI v. M/S WEL INTERTRADE PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of additions under Section 68 after finding the assessee proved creditworthiness and genuineness of loans, held income from a business centre as business income, and allowed related deductions under the Income Tax Act.
Ankur Jain v. Scindia Potteries and Services Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for wilful breach of court undertakings amounting to civil contempt, emphasizing the necessity of obedience to judicial orders to uphold the rule of law.
Chirag Khandal v. Equestrian Federation of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Equestrian Federation of India's amended selection criteria for the 19th Asian Games were invalid due to non-compliance with its statutes and the National Sports Development Code, emphasizing the necessity of fairness, transparency, and adherence to procedural norms in sports selections.
Paraj Baigsen v. University Grants Commission
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the UGC-NET 2018 final answer key, holding that courts should not interfere with expert decisions absent demonstrable error or mala fide.
ITD Cementation India Limited v. SSJV-ZVS Joint Venture
The Delhi High Court held that members of a joint venture are jointly and severally liable for execution of an arbitral award against the joint venture, dismissing the application to exclude a constituent member from the proceedings.
Campus Activewear Limited v. Rama Shankar Garg & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s interlocutory injunction application in a trademark dispute, holding that defendants’ prior use of the mark “CAMPS” precludes a prima facie case of infringement or passing off.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Jogi Veko & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an Employees’ Compensation order for denying the insurance company an opportunity to contest liability, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with procedural fairness.
Inderjeet Singh v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
Delhi High Court directs timely convening of Departmental Promotion Committee to consider petitioner for promotion to Principal post, emphasizing adherence to DoPT guidelines and employee rights.
WENDYS RESTAURANT v. STATE GNCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 336 and 304A IPC based on a voluntary compromise between parties in an accidental death case, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Anubhav Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a private altercation between neighbors following an amicable settlement and directed the accused to perform social service.
Vikram Singh and Inderdeep Singh v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court dismissed the DDA's review petition for lack of error apparent on record or new evidence, affirming the limited scope of review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
P. Padmanabha Rao v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Institution of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineers is a private society not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 as it does not qualify as 'State' under Article 12 of the Constitution.
Deep Chand Lunia & Anr. v. Akhil Garg
The Delhi High Court held that a written statement filed within the extended 120-day period and accompanied by a signed affidavit cannot be struck off record for absence of signatures, which is a curable irregularity.
Anil Anand & Anr. v. Tripta Chawla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of pleadings to place on record a pending writ petition as a subsequent event during the pendency of a civil suit, modifying the trial court's order dismissing such application.
Mahender Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous a writ petition seeking 3rd MACP benefits and promotion after the respondents granted the reliefs sought.
Sukam Systems Private Limited v. Lithium Power Energy Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against the defendant for infringing the plaintiff's registered trademarks "Su-Kam" and related marks, accepting the defendant's undertaking to cease use and withdraw its trademark application.