Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Neelmani Singh v. Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for partition is not barred by limitation and allegations of forgery of a Will raise triable issues, thus the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC at the threshold.
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Santosh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Louis Vuitton against defendants manufacturing and selling counterfeit goods bearing its well-known trademarks, proceeding ex parte due to defendants' non-appearance.
Mohini Electricals Limited v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court set aside the Delhi Jal Board's debarment of Mohini Electricals Limited for failure to issue a prior show cause notice and applied COVID-19 related MSME relief measures.
Nanu Ram Goyal v. Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that inordinate delay of over thirteen years in adjudicating a service tax show cause notice, without justified cause and without informing the petitioner of procedural abeyance, renders the proceedings impermissible and liable to be quashed.
Mankind Pharma Limited v. Arvind Kumar Trading and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed Mankind Pharma's petition to cancel the confusingly similar "NIKIND" trademark registered by the respondent for non-use and deceptive similarity with the petitioner's well-known "KIND" family of marks.
Colvyn James Harris v. Flexing IT Services Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act for conversion of CCDs, holding that concealment of material facts disentitles the petitioner and that the dispute is to be resolved by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique v. CPIO (IS-I) (IS-IV Desk) Ministry of Home Affairs
The Delhi High Court upheld the exemption of sensitive intelligence information related to the banning of Indian Mujahideen under the RTI Act, dismissing the petition filed by a death row convict seeking such information.
Gopal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF authorities to decide the petitioners' pending representations seeking pay and career progression benefits within a fixed time, without adjudicating on the merits.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. M/S Maverick Mobile Solution
The Delhi High Court dismissed BSNL's petition to set aside an arbitral award, holding that the award was well-reasoned, within jurisdiction, and not in violation of public policy or fundamental law.
Rohit Panjwani v. M/S BSES Rajdhani Power Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioner voluntarily resigned and dismissed the writ petition challenging the rejection of his claim of forced resignation.
Satish Kumar Linda v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner’s representation against his transfer within a stipulated time and stayed the transfer order pending such decision.
The Boeing Company & Anr. v. Advance Technologies & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to The Boeing Company against defendants for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off, decreeing the suit due to defendants' non-appearance.
Aeronutrix Sports Products Pvt Ltd v. Plumax Ebusiness Solutions Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by recording a lawful settlement agreement wherein the defendants acknowledged the plaintiff's rights, withdrew oppositions, agreed to damages, and undertook not to infringe in future.
Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. v. Vijay D. Kasbe
The Supreme Court held that Supervisors who are government servants holding civil posts are not entitled to double overtime allowance under the Factories Act, as their service conditions are governed by statutory service rules.
Ansar Ahmad v. Uttar Pradesh State and Others
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's bail orders in a contract killing case involving accused with serious criminal antecedents, emphasizing judicial discretion and directing expedited trial.
Ansar Ahmad v. Uttar Pradesh State and Others
The Supreme Court set aside bail granted to accused in a contract killing case, emphasizing judicial discretion and factors to consider in bail matters while directing expeditious trial.
Punjab and Sind Bank v. Frontline Corporation Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act to grant injunctions against secured creditors' actions unless fraud is shown, and restored the Single Judge's order permitting the bank to proceed with sale of the mortgaged property.
SUNEJA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. ANITA MERCHANT
The Supreme Court upheld the award of compound interest at 14% by Consumer Fora as equitable compensation for prolonged illegal retention of payment by builders in real estate deficiency of service cases.
SUNEJA TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. ANITA MERCHANT
The Supreme Court upheld the award of compound interest at 14% per annum by Consumer Fora on refund of amounts paid for undelivered flats, affirming their power to grant such equitable relief in deficiency of service cases.
Narsi Creation Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
The Supreme Court dismissed applications seeking to vacate a status quo order during ongoing arbitration, emphasizing non-interference with arbitration proceedings until a final award is passed.