Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Vikas Vij & Anr. v. Vikram Vij & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a party has the right to withdraw an application under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and file a fresh one, and set aside the Trial Court's refusal to grant such liberty without reasons.
SAP LABS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 6
The Supreme Court held that the High Court can examine under Section 260A IT Act whether the Tribunal followed statutory guidelines in determining arm's length price and can interfere if perversity is shown, rejecting the absolute finality of Tribunal's determination.
SAP LABS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE 6
The Supreme Court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's determination of arm's length price is subject to judicial scrutiny under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act if perversity or non-compliance with statutory guidelines is demonstrated, and remitted the appeals for fresh consideration accordingly.
Gwalior Development Authority v. Bhanu Pratap Singh
The Supreme Court held that a registered lease deed executed pursuant to a tender conclusively settles the transaction and the High Court cannot direct execution of a lease deed for remaining land without consideration under writ jurisdiction.
Gwalior Development Authority v. Bhanu Pratap Singh
The Supreme Court held that a registered lease deed executed pursuant to a tender process attains finality and the High Court cannot direct execution of a lease for remaining land without consideration under its writ jurisdiction.
Delhi Development Authority v. Shiv Raj
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession has been taken, overruling earlier contrary decisions.
Land Acquisition Collector (South) v. Hari Chand
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken prior to the Act's commencement, overruling Pune Municipal Corporation.
Land Acquisition Collector (South) v. Hari Chand
The Supreme Court held that land acquisition does not lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession was taken before the Act's commencement, overruling earlier contrary precedent.
Welspun Enterprises Ltd v. Kasthuri Infra Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that once an Arbitral Tribunal is constituted, interim relief applications under Section 9 must be decided by the Tribunal unless exceptional circumstances justify Court intervention.
Sabita Rajesh Narang v. Sandeep Gopal Raheja & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the dismissal of a suit as barred by limitation and the Benami Act based on pleadings and admissions, holding that preliminary issues under Section 9A CPC can be decided without evidence if parties consent.
Vishal Kanhaiyalal Shrimali v. Union Territory of Daman and Diu
The Bombay High Court quashed detention orders passed under the PASA Act for lack of material and non-application of mind, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural safeguards in preventive detention cases.
The State of Maharashtra v. Baburao Tayappa Mhetre
The High Court allowed the State's appeal, convicting a public servant and an abettor for corruption offences, holding that instructing another to accept bribe does not absolve liability and minor witness variances do not warrant acquittal.
Sri Sarada College of Education for Women v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court set aside the withdrawal of recognition of a B.Ed. institution by NCTE for failure to properly consider submitted documents and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with due process.
Amarjit Singh Kalra v. Pramod Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed certain appellants to withdraw land acquisition appeals based on a compromise deed and ordered release of deposited funds, while directing merits hearing for appellants disputing the compromise.
Prakash Jha and Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
PS Toll Road Private Limited v. National Highway Authority of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief against suspension under a concession agreement, holding that disputes are arbitrable and must be resolved by the constituted Arbitral Tribunal.
Doon Valley Institute of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court held that a recognized institution’s name cannot be withheld from the NCTE list or admissions made conditional on pending withdrawal proceedings under Section 17, but upheld the validity of the Show Cause Notice requiring the institution’s response.
Amit Podar and Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 406 and 120B IPC based on a full and voluntary settlement in a commercial dispute, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
M/S. TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LIMITED v. M/S. VISTA INFORMATION SYSTEMS PRIVATE LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award, holding that the award was within the arbitrator's jurisdiction, based on a possible interpretation of contract and evidence, and did not violate principles of natural justice or public policy.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. S K Ghosh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the trial court alone bears the duty to examine the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C., set aside costs imposed on the CBI for delay in submitting draft questions, and expunged disparaging remarks against the CBI, emphasizing judicial restraint.