Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rahul Sharma v. Anisha Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn after parties settled their matrimonial dispute under The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, enforcing the settlement terms including maintenance payments and release of deposited funds.
Bimla Kapoor & Ors. v. Sangita Bhutani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit filed against a deceased defendant is not maintainable and must be withdrawn to file a fresh suit against the legal representatives.
Ms. Shyel Trehan, Mr. Rohan Poddar & Ms. Shivalika Rudrabatla v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed parties to clarify funding responsibilities for DMD clinical trials and adjourned the matter pending affidavits, without granting stay on fund release.
Shalini Singh v. United India Insurance Company Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking disciplinary action and disclosure of a vigilance enquiry report, holding that no proceedings were warranted and prior RTI refusals precluded disclosure in the petition.
Surinder Dhall & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to petitioners in a criminal case after charge-sheet filing, confirming interim bail with conditions.
Praveen Kumar Sharma v. The Central Registrar Multi State Cooperative Societies
The Delhi High Court held that a cooperative society not substantially controlled or financed by the Government and performing private functions is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226.
Bennett, Coleman and Company Limited & Anr. v. Planet Media Group & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to the registered proprietor of the "MISS INDIA" trademark restraining unauthorized use by defendants in similar beauty pageants, holding such use as infringement and passing off.
Rajiv Ranjan Singh v. Securities & Exchange Board of India & The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court held that absence of penalty in SEBI adjudication does not bar criminal prosecution under Section 27(1) of the SEBI Act and upheld the rejection of discharge of the CEO accused of unauthorized pledging of client securities.
GMR Warora Energy Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
The Supreme Court affirmed that statutory and regulatory changes by government instrumentalities after the PPA cut-off date constitute ‘Change in Law’ events entitling power generators to compensation, including carrying cost at the contractual Late Payment Surcharge rate.
GMR Warora Energy Limited v. Central Electricity Regulatory Commission
The Supreme Court held that levies and notifications by governmental instrumentalities after the cut-off date constitute ‘Change in Law’ events under PPAs, entitling generators to compensation and carrying cost at specified rates.
Charan Singh @ Charanjit Singh v. The State of Uttarakhand
The Supreme Court overturned the conviction for dowry death due to lack of evidence of cruelty or harassment soon before death, emphasizing the necessity of proving essential ingredients before invoking statutory presumptions under Section 304B IPC.
Kashi Nath Singh @ Kallu Singh v. The State of Jharkhand
The Supreme Court modified the life sentence without remission for brutal rape and murder of a minor to a fixed 30-year term, balancing reformation prospects with deterrence and victim rights.
Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited v. Adani Power (Mumbai) Limited
The Supreme Court upheld CERC and APTEL orders granting Adani Power relief for domestic coal shortage under Change in Law provisions, dismissing the appellants' claim to limit relief to 70% domestic coal.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited
The Supreme Court upheld regulatory orders granting Change in Law relief to Adani Power for shortfall in assured domestic coal linkage, rejecting claims for relief beyond 70% domestic coal and affirming the compensation methodology.
Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited v. Adani Power (Mumbai) Limited
The Supreme Court upheld CERC's tariff relief to Adani Power for domestic coal shortage limited to coal allocation under linkage, dismissing Haryana Utilities' appeal challenging the methodology and entitlement.
Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. & Anr. v. Adani Power (Mundra) Limited & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld regulatory orders granting Change in Law relief to Adani Power for shortfall in assured domestic coal linkage, rejecting the appellants' claim for relief on imported coal and affirming the compensation methodology.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited
The Supreme Court upheld that the SHAKTI Policy constitutes a Change in Law entitling APML to compensation and carrying cost, dismissing MSEDCL's appeals challenging regulatory orders.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited
The Supreme Court upheld MERC's orders allowing compensation to a power producer for regulatory changes in coal supply policy under PPAs, dismissing challenges by the distribution company.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited
The Supreme Court upheld that the SHAKTI Policy constitutes a Change in Law entitling APML to compensation, affirmed compliance with notice requirements, allowed carrying cost, and dismissed MSEDCL's appeals challenging regulatory relief.
Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited v. Adani Power Maharashtra Limited
The Supreme Court held that cancellation of coal linkage due to government environmental notifications after bid cut-off date constitutes a change in law and force majeure under PPAs, entitling the power producer to compensation including transportation charges.