Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Shreyansh Sharma v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The Delhi High Court upheld the University's 'no rank violation' policy in special spot offline counseling, dismissing the petition challenging merit-based admission restrictions despite vacant seats.
Glaxo Group Limited v. Naresh Goel & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a trademark infringement suit in terms of a court-mediated settlement where the defendants ceased infringing use and agreed to specific undertakings regarding the disputed marks and packaging.
Ajay Khera v. State of GNCTD
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a senior citizen accused in a multi-crore economic offence case after finding the investigation complete and no specific risk of tampering or flight.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Prince
The Delhi High Court held that courts must exercise judicial restraint and avoid directing or monitoring police disciplinary actions through repeated orders and adverse remarks, which amount to judicial overreach.
Sonal Aggarwal alias Sonal Sharma v. Vishal Sharma
The Delhi High Court held that maintenance granted under Domestic Violence proceedings does not bar a fresh maintenance claim under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration.
Refrigerated Water Licensees Association v. Commissioner South Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking a ban on sale of contaminated water and harmful drinks by unlicensed hawkers, holding that the Municipal Corporation of Delhi has been taking adequate enforcement action and must continue to do so.
Chetan v. Union of India and Anr.
Delhi High Court directs a fresh independent medical examination for a BSF recruitment candidate declared medically unfit, with the final report binding and appointment under EWS quota if found fit.
Sasi Kumar P v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation regarding disciplinary proceedings within a stipulated time, without quashing the charges at this stage.
UNDER ARMOUR, INC v. ADITYA BIRLA FASHION & RETAIL LTD.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction holding that the defendant's use of marks similar to the plaintiff's registered trademarks on identical sports apparel is prima facie infringing under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
M/S DOON VALLEY FOODS PVT LTD v. M/S BASHESHWAR LAL AMIT KUMAR
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory 120-day period for filing written statements in commercial suits under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 cannot be extended by condoning delay, even due to unforeseen disasters.
Soni Dave v. Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the Executing Court to dispose of a seven-year-old execution petition within eight weeks, emphasizing the High Court’s supervisory role to ensure expeditious execution proceedings.
Sadab @ Nazeem & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308, 506, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement between the parties involving simple injuries.
Abhishek Kapoor & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Vikas Verma & Ors. v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under its inherent powers, holding that amicable settlement between parties justifies quashing to prevent abuse of court process.
G S Berar and Co Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Trans Asian Industries Expositions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court directed the executing court to dispose of a seven-year-old execution petition within eight weeks, emphasizing its supervisory role to ensure expeditious execution proceedings in line with Supreme Court guidelines.
Veritas (India) Ltd. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh FDI approval application under the current policy for expeditious merit-based consideration, holding that pendency of tax appeals does not justify rejection without merits.
The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Simarjeet Kaur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded under the Employees’ Compensation Act for injury arising out of employment despite delay in treatment and absence of police records, affirming employer-employee relationship on admissions and witness testimony.
Abdul Hamid Turkman v. Narcotics Control Bureau
Delhi High Court dismissed bail application of Afghan national accused of trafficking intermediate quantity of heroin, emphasizing flight risk and seriousness of offence under NDPS Act.
Rohan BRC Gas Equipment Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. Union of India Through Ministry of Heavy Industries & Ors.
The Delhi High Court permitted the petitioners to withdraw their writ petition with liberty to pursue alternate legal remedies, as no decision on merits or jurisdiction had been rendered.
Ved Parkash Yadav v. RWA Krishna Appartment
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for malicious prosecution and defamation is barred by limitation against one defendant but not against another where a fresh cause of action arose from defamatory pleadings, and dismissed the limitation-based dismissal application against the latter for lack of clear admissions.