Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
CC and CE and ST, NOIDA v. M/s Interarch Building Products Pvt. Ltd.
The Supreme Court held that service tax on works contract services must be paid on the service portion as per Rule 2A or Composition Scheme, disallowing CENVAT Credit on inputs if tax is paid on entire contract value including goods.
Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order suspending life sentences and granting bail to murder convicts, holding that suspension of sentence post-conviction is exceptional and the High Court erred in reappreciating evidence at the bail stage.
Omprakash Sahni v. Jai Shankar Chaudhary & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order suspending life sentences and granting bail to murder convicts, holding that suspension of sentence under Section 389 CrPC is an exceptional relief requiring cogent reasons and should not involve reappreciation of evidence.
Haryana State v. Heera Singh
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order deeming land acquisition complete under the 2013 Act and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in light of possession, title, and statutory conditions.
The State of Haryana & Ors v. Hira Singh
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order declaring land acquisition lapsed and remanded the cases for fresh consideration of possession and compensation issues under the 2013 Act and relevant precedent.
Moser Baer Karamchari Union v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the IBC's waterfall mechanism capping workmen's dues to 24 months and excluding Companies Act provisions in liquidation, affirming legislative intent and economic policy balance.
Moser Baer Karamchari Union v. Union of India
The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the IBC's waterfall mechanism and Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013, affirming that insolvency proceedings under the IBC supersede preferential payment provisions of the Companies Act and that the classification of workmen's dues is reasonable and constitutionally valid.
Municipal Commissioner, Jamnagar Municipal Corporation v. R. M. Doshi
The Supreme Court held that a dismissal order passed without delegated authority is void but can be validated by subsequent ratification by the competent authority, thereby upholding the Municipal Commissioner's order of dismissal against the City Engineer.
Municipal Commissioner, Jamnagar Municipal Corporation v. R.M. Doshi
The Supreme Court held that a dismissal order passed without delegated authority can be validated by subsequent ratification by the competent authority, thereby restoring the dismissal of the municipal officer.
Municipal Commissioner, Jamnagar Municipal Corporation v. R. M. Doshi
The Supreme Court held that a municipal commissioner’s dismissal order passed without jurisdiction is void unless validly ratified, and restored the dismissal order against the respondent after finding proper ratification by the competent authority.
Municipal Commissioner, Jamnagar Municipal Corporation v. R.M. Doshi
The Supreme Court held that a dismissal order passed without authority can be validated by ratification from the competent authority, restoring the dismissal of a municipal officer despite initial procedural defects.
V. G. Vipkin Kumar v. State Bank of Hyderabad & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the bank's auction and sale of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act, dismissing writ petitions challenging the proceedings and affirming the primacy of statutory remedies before the DRT.
V. G. Vipkin Kumar v. State Bank of Hyderabad & Ors.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the bank's auction and recovery proceedings under the SARFAESI Act, dismissing the borrower's writ petitions for non-exhaustion of statutory remedies.
G. Vikram Kumar v. State Bank of Hyderabad
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order staying an e-auction sale under SARFAESI Act, holding that an agreement to sale without prior permission is void and alternative remedy under Section 17 bars writ petitions under Article 226.
M/S Athaang Dichpally Tollway Private Limited v. The National Highways Authority of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court referred contractual disputes involving unilateral imposition of damages under a concession agreement to arbitration, appointing a sole arbitrator and maintaining interim relief.
Vinayak Polytechnic College v. All India Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court directed AICTE to process and decide the petitioner’s application for approval of a new technical institution course by June 30, 2023, disposing of the writ petition challenging the moratorium on fresh approvals.
Amar Chand Sharma v. Anshul Jain
The Delhi High Court granted a final opportunity to the petitioner to lead evidence and summon official witnesses while imposing costs for delay, directing the trial court to proceed expeditiously.
MBL Infrastructure Ltd v. Rites Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral order rejecting amendment of claims that finally disposes of those claims constitutes an interim award and is challengeable under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Khilender Gupta Trading as M/s Bobby Enterprises v. Rakesh Kumar Trading as M/s Sai Birbal Das Foods
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's amendment application to change the date of first use of the trademark "BOOM BOOM" and incorporate additional facts, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments before trial.
Nitin Khasana @ Kasana v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC, emphasizing absence of risk of tampering with evidence and considering prolonged custody despite serious charges.