Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Rakesh Kumar Sarswa v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw his writ petition challenging promotions with liberty to file a fresh petition on the same issue.
Anoop Kumar Garg v. The Commissioner of Customs (Imports)
The Delhi High Court held that amounts deposited under protest and during investigation must be considered for pre-deposit under Section 129E of the Customs Act, allowing appeals dismissed by CESTAT for non-payment of fresh pre-deposit to be heard on merits.
Shri Ram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Maya Devi and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's award granting compensation with a one-third deduction for personal expenses to an unmarried deceased whose mother and unmarried sister were dependents, affirming flexibility in applying standard deduction norms.
Tarun Kumar Patel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's refusal to interfere with a pending show cause notice regarding exhaustion of promotion chances, allowing limited opportunity to file a supplementary response.
Rohit Khandelwal v. National Insurance Company Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking pension benefits by treating resignation as voluntary retirement, holding that acceptance of resignation and ineligibility for voluntary retirement preclude pension claims under the 1995 Scheme.
M/S CHAUHAN KIRANA TRADING v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders for lack of fair hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
M/S WALSONS SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. SALES TAX OFFICER/CLASS II (STO), DGST & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST tax demand order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Sunita Rani v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST tax demand order passed without proper notice and hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
Mujahat Ali Khan v. Lokpal of India
The Delhi High Court quashed Lokpal orders and investigation against the petitioner for failure to afford mandatory hearing under Section 20(3) of the Lokpal Act before directing investigation.
Ramesh Kumar & Ors. v. Rajiv Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on the ground of bona fide requirement by a practicing advocate landlord, affirming the landlord’s right to choose premises and limiting tenant interference.
Ranju Lehra Das v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging denial of promotion where the petitioner voluntarily did not appear for the mandatory promotional examination and failed to meet eligibility criteria.
Ram Shovit Singh v. Sangeeta Gupta and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order against a tenant who failed to file leave to defend within the statutory period despite valid service by affixation, dismissing the revision petition challenging the eviction.
Richa Tiwari v. Kumar Sambhav Mishra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of contradictory pleadings or concealment of facts, and set aside the order rejecting the partition suit plaint on such grounds.
Mohd Mansoor v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to comply with permissible use conditions and pay misuse charges, refusing to quash MCD's notices for revocation of trade license due to misuse of premises.
Surbhi Catering v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court grants a seven-month extension of a catering stall license at Sant Hirdaram Nagar Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and consistent relief in similar cases.
Sh Raj Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking departmental enquiry against MCD officials for alleged identity disclosure, holding that disputed factual issues cannot be decided in writ proceedings and the petitioner’s claim was unsubstantiated.
Satish Kumar v. State (Govt. NCT Delhi) & Anr.
The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that statutory presumptions arise upon admission of cheque signatures and can only be rebutted by credible evidence, which the petitioner failed to provide.
Rajendra Singh v. Saroj Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act, holding that a cheque issued from the drawer's personal account creates personal liability which cannot be negated by claims of acting on behalf of a society.
Central Bank of India v. Anil Kumar & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an employee for misappropriation of funds, setting aside the Labour Court's reinstatement order due to lack of valid defense and the importance of maintaining integrity in financial institutions.
Mr. Mritunjay v. Ex JWO Brij Mohan Verma
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Coronary Artery Disease, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attributability to military service and limiting writ review to jurisdictional errors.