Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Puneet Kapoor v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Madhu Arora
The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against the petitioner as cognizance was taken beyond the limitation period without condonation of delay or hearing, and the complaint was found to be mala fide and vexatious.
M/S Saraswati Eduvision Pvt Ltd v. Piramal Capital and Housing Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging refusal of interim relief by the DRAT in a SARFAESI Act auction dispute, emphasizing the need to exhaust statutory remedies before invoking Article 226 jurisdiction.
Satpudke Tarkeshwar Dashrath v. Union of India
The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition challenging the disciplinary punishment order.
Aryan Infraheight P Limited v. Signature Global India Ltd
Delhi High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to appoint arbitrators under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act where cause of action arises outside Delhi and arbitration clauses restrict appointment to a non-appointed arbitrator.
Lalita Devi v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court grants a seven-month extension of a catering stall license at Prayagraj Railway Station, affirming jurisdiction and relying on uniform Indian Railways policy and prior precedents.
Arun Kumar Singh @ Arun Kumar Jain v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide it within six weeks, disposing of the petition without granting further relief.
Vijender v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the Indian Coast Guard to grant technical resignation and No-Objection Certificate to an officer confirmed as Navik (GD) to join the BSF as Sub-Inspector, applying relaxed eligibility guidelines.
Dharmendra Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
A writ petition for re-fixation of seniority is not maintainable without impleading all necessary parties, and failure to do so results in dismissal with liberty to re-file.
M/S RBC FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order lacking reasons, granted the petitioner an opportunity for personal hearing and filing reply, and left the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court's pending decision.
Delhi Sales Corporation v. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that payment of tax and interest before issuance of a show cause notice under Section 74(5) CGST Act limits penalty liability to 15%, quashing further penalty demands against the petitioner upon deposit of the said amount.
Manoj Kumar Yadav v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for re-fixation of seniority due to non-impleadment of necessary parties, emphasizing the mandatory procedural requirement to include all interested parties in seniority disputes.
Sh. Ram Gopal & Ors. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
JSW MG MOTOR INDIA PVT. LTD. v. M/S TRISTAR AUTO AGENCIES (VIZAG) PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, holding that a prior final judicial order rejecting arbitration under Section 8 operates as res judicata and bars subsequent arbitration proceedings.
Gautam Mehra v. Sonia Mehra
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim custody order granting custody of two minor children to the mother, emphasizing the paramount welfare principle and the children’s expressed preferences.
Surinder Kumar Grover v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a probate petition, holding that the Will was validly executed and Letters of Administration should be granted to the appellant, dismissing the partition suit.
Aqualite Industries Private Ltd v. Relaxo Footwears Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction against Aqualite for pirating Relaxo's registered footwear designs, affirming the protection of novel design features under the Designs Act, 2000.
CREST DIGITEL PRIVATE LIMITED v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the issuance of a telecom infrastructure contract by nomination without tendering under Rule 194 of GFR, rejecting claims of discrimination and affirming exceptions to public tendering in exceptional circumstances.
Shri Munna Prasad v. Employees State Insurance Corporation and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the statutory scheme under the ESI Act, ruling that permanent disablement benefits need not be equated with minimum wages and dismissed the petition challenging the quantum of benefits.
Rakesh Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Section 307/34 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served, emphasizing rehabilitation and mitigating factors in sentencing.
Bhoop Singh Gola v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s dismissal of a belated amendment application in a thirty-year-old suit, emphasizing the need to prevent prejudice and delay under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.