Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Anil Keruji Jagtap v. Razzak Nazimuddin Kazi
The Bombay High Court held that the Supreme Court’s Covid-19 limitation exclusion applies to statutory timelines for auction sale deposits under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Rules, validating delayed payments and upholding the auction confirmation.
The Maharashtra Rajya Padvidhar Prathamik Shikshak Va Kendrapramukh Sabha and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra
The Bombay High Court upheld the validity of the Maharashtra Government Resolution 2024 on teacher staffing and transfers, holding it consistent with the RTE Act and constitutional provisions, and dismissed writ petitions challenging it.
Kalim Attarli Shaikh v. The State of Maharashtra
The High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual assault of a minor under Section 354 IPC and Section 10 POCSO Act, holding that circumstantial evidence and conduct of the accused can establish guilt despite lack of direct in-court identification.
M/S PASSERINE WEALTH SOLUTION PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S R3PM HOSPITALITY LLP AND ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator by mutual consent under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 despite the arbitration clause providing for a three-member tribunal.
CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited v. Indusind Bank
The Delhi High Court directed the Debts Recovery Tribunal to defer final hearing until the Appellate Tribunal grants a preliminary hearing, emphasizing natural justice and invalidity of unsanctioned praecipe procedures.
Sonu Dahiya v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the period of interim bail extended as emergency parole during the COVID-19 pandemic must be counted towards the sentence undergone by the convicted prisoner.
Shamshad Ahmad v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner’s bail application, holding that bail once granted should not be cancelled without material change or misuse, emphasizing protection of personal liberty in a financial fraud case primarily based on documentary evidence.
Rakesh Singh v. Amit Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that only the registered conveyance deed dated 12.12.2002 confers valid title, declared subsequent sale deeds forged and void, and dismissed the subsequent purchaser's claim for ownership.
Directorate of Enforcement v. Poonam Malik
The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of ED's freezing orders under PMLA for lack of 'reason to believe' and procedural non-compliance, affirming that mere suspicion is insufficient to freeze property.
Kunal Gosain and Kartikey Sikka v. Jupinder Kaur Maker
The Delhi High Court held that a consent order recording settlement terms with an undertaking to the Court is enforceable through contempt proceedings, and wilful disobedience thereof constitutes civil contempt.
RI NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WORLD PHONE INTERNET SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that disputes arising between telecom service providers under an operational merger agreement fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the TDSAT, barring civil court suits.
Didar Singh & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on consistent and reliable dying declarations and corroborative circumstantial evidence, affirming that a voluntary dying declaration can solely sustain a conviction even without magistrate recording or medical certification.
K P Rana v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of parts of an arbitral award that improperly awarded claims beyond contractual terms and emphasized limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
M/S ALPRO INDUSTRIES v. M/S AMBIENCE PVT. LIMITED & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an interim arbitral award due to the unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator without an express waiver in writing, holding such appointment void ab initio under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
M/S Satveer Sharma v. Global Canesugar Services Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the Court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed an arbitrator accordingly, leaving all substantive issues for arbitration.
Libra Associates v. Dabur India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by one party violates the Arbitration Act's impartiality requirements and appointed a neutral arbitrator under Section 11.
Ankur Gauri @ Ankur & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(B), 509, 506, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and the victim's unwillingness to proceed, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Roop Singh @ Rupesh Kumar & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a noncompoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC on the ground of amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Vikrant Mathur & Anr. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 377, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and absence of prosecution interest, exercising its inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Saleem Ahmad v. The State, NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed compounding of a Section 138 NI Act offence after conviction and dismissal of appeal upon amicable settlement, imposing costs as per Supreme Court guidelines.