Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Staff Selection Commission v. Balkar Mor
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order directing a fresh committee to re-examine candidates' cases where criminal investigations are ongoing, holding that such parallel inquiry is impermissible.
P K Bohra v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that suspension extension recommended within 90 days by the competent authority and approved later by the Central Government is valid and does not render the suspension period invalid.
Pradeep and Ors. v. Savitri Sidana and Ors.
The High Court upheld the Trial Court's order permitting the respondent's husband to be examined as a witness before the respondent herself, as the respondent did not intend to testify personally, thus dismissing the petition challenging the order.
M/S EOS DEVELOPERS PVT LTD v. M/S CYAN FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's orders allowing change of authorised representative and admission of additional documents, holding acceptance of costs estops challenge and the petition barred by delay.
M/S SMS LOGISTICS v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (GENERAL), NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court set aside the revocation of a Customs Broker License imposed for filing a Bill of Entry based on a disputed High Sea Sales Agreement, holding the punishment disproportionate and emphasizing the doctrine of proportionality in administrative disciplinary actions.
Arjun Aggarwal & Ors. v. Govind Ram Aggarwal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order proceeding with trial despite pending but unpressed applications under Order VII Rule 10 and 11 CPC, dismissing the petitioners' review application and condemning their delay tactics.
Gopal Jha v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges against the petitioner for sexual offences, holding that sufficient prima facie material existed despite delay and discrepancies, and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of FIR and charges.
Saurabh Tripathi v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with penetrative sexual assault of a minor under the POCSO Act, relying on consistent victim testimony and DNA evidence to deny bail.
State v. Kamlesh Bahadur
The High Court set aside the acquittal under section 308 IPC and convicted the accused under section 323 IPC for causing simple injuries, emphasizing the necessity of proving intention or knowledge for section 308 offences.
M/S RAHUL KUMAR JAIN AND CO. v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court quashed a GST registration cancellation order for lack of reasons and violation of natural justice, emphasizing the need for specific grounds in show cause notices and orders.
Vinod Kumar v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that a director cannot be personally prosecuted under Section 138 NI Act without the company being made a party, dismissing the leave petition against the trial court's order.
Brij Mohan Sarna v. Sushma Chawla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the suit property was used exclusively for commercial purposes, affirming the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and summary decree for possession under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
Prem Behl v. Lalit Chanana and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an Independent Director who resigned prior to a complaint and was not involved in day-to-day management cannot be held personally liable for non-payment of employees' salaries under the Delhi Shops & Establishment Act, 1954 without specific evidence of knowledge or involvement.
National Insurance Co Ltd v. Heera Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court reduced compensation by 25% due to contributory negligence, upheld the Tribunal's jurisdiction, and rejected insurer's recovery claim against driver and owner in a motor accident claim.
Smt. Rekha Manohar Ghansharamani & Ors. v. Janardhan Prasad Chaturvedi & Ors.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the partnership dissolved on a partner's death and the suit challenging sale agreements was barred by limitation.
Hemant Dinkar Kandlur v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Bombay High Court held that the 2014 amendment restricting capital gains exemption under Section 54(F) to properties purchased 'in India' is prospective and does not apply to investments made abroad before 1st April 2015, allowing the petitioner’s claim.
Meeti Developers Private Limited v. New Kamal Kunj Co-operative Housing Society Limited
The Bombay High Court upheld the housing society's termination of the development agreement with Meeti Developers due to defaults and refused interim relief to the developer, allowing the society to proceed with redevelopment through other means.
Undercarriage and Tractor Parts Pvt. Ltd. v. Dispute Resolution Panel – 3
The Bombay High Court held that the Dispute Resolution Panel has no jurisdiction to issue directions after the Assessing Officer passes the final assessment order, quashing the DRP's directions and consequent assessment order.
Nandu Maruti Pol v. Satishkumar Satyanarayan Agarwal
The Bombay High Court held that the executing Court erred in granting extension of time for deposit of balance consideration after an inordinate delay without sufficient explanation, and quashed the order allowing such extension in a specific performance decree execution.
The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik v. Balu Baburao Dhanwate; The Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Nashik v. Dadasaheb Gangadhar Shete
The Bombay High Court upheld the reinstatement of Muster Assistants terminated without statutory compliance, affirming their status as workmen entitled to protection under labour laws.