Search Judgments
Search by legal issue, facts, citation, statute, or case name
Nadeem Majid Oomerbhoy v. Sh. Gautam Tank and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that infringement cannot be found against a registered trademark holder without invalidating their registration and exercised suo motu powers to examine the validity of the defendants' trademark registration in an 18-year-old infringement suit.
F HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & OTHERS v. DRUGS CONTROLLER GENERAL OF INDIA & OTHERS
The Delhi High Court held that suits challenging biosimilar drug approvals granted by DCGI disclose cause of action and are maintainable, dismissing defendants' applications for rejection of plaints under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Kesar Ali & Anr. v. Santosh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to correct the multiplier based on the deceased's age and granted future prospects enhancement in motor accident compensation following Supreme Court precedents.
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Smt. Omwati and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding that the accident was caused by the rash and negligent driving of the bus driver, and a typographical error in cross-examination could not absolve liability.
Kumar Gaurav & Anr. v. State N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for grievous injury but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering the petitioners' age, health, and family responsibilities, imposing a cost payable to a government relief fund.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-4 v. Global Logic India Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing due to lack of segmental data and dismissed the revenue’s appeal challenging the treatment of foreign exchange gains/losses.
Mohammad Irshad & Ors. v. The State of NCT, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking declaration of lapse of land acquisition proceedings from 1948 under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, holding that concluded acquisitions cannot be reopened after decades.
Rekha Drall v. Vikash Drall
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal against a Family Court decree granting divorce to the husband on grounds of mental cruelty including threats of suicide and false criminal allegations.
Sateesh Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Ward-28(5), Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has the power to annul assessment orders under Section 251 of the Income Tax Act, and statutory remedies must be exhausted before approaching the High Court.
Brij Mohan v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the termination of an employee following a valid disciplinary enquiry conducted by competent authorities in accordance with law and principles of natural justice.
Shefali Khuller Ahuja v. Dharmendra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against NDMC and Wonderland School, holding that the respondents complied with the Court’s 2020 order regarding license fee payments and audits under the Right to Free Education Act.
M/S. ASHA AUTO AGENCIES AND ORS v. RAJESH KUMAR SHARMA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the trial court's order refusing to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the suit was within limitation and territorial jurisdiction and no jurisdictional error was committed.
Seema v. Vijay Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld divorce granted on cruelty grounds due to the wife's refusal to consummate marriage, rejecting her appeal challenging the decree.
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. ANJU & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that a vehicle owner who verifies a driver’s licence on its face and tests the driver’s competence is not liable for a fake licence, dismissing the insurer’s appeal to recover compensation from the owner and driver.
Anupam Mittal v. People Interactive (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Bombay High Court granted an anti-enforcement injunction restraining enforcement of a Singapore anti-suit injunction, holding that oppression and mismanagement disputes are non-arbitrable and exclusively within the NCLT's jurisdiction under Indian law.
Sakhawat Ibrahim Naik v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation
The High Court held that reinstatement means restoration to the original post and directed the petitioner to be reinstated as wireman with full back wages, setting aside dismissal and Industrial Court’s order dismissing unfair labour practice complaint.
M/s. Stanship Logistics Pvt. Ltd. v. The Deputy Commissioner of State Tax
The Bombay High Court held that a person against whom a CGST detention order is passed can file an appeal even if tax and penalty are paid by another party on his behalf, and directed the appellate authority to admit and decide the appeal on merits.
INTERNATIONAL FOODSTUFFS CO. LLC v. VIJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND PAWAN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark dispute between International Foodstuffs Co. LLC and respondents based on a lawful settlement agreement delineating trademark rights and use.
Pentel Kabushiki Kaisha & Anr v. M/S Arora Sationers and Ors
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit in terms of a mutually agreed settlement concerning design infringement, binding the parties to the settlement terms and ordering partial refund of court fees.
Hemavathi & Ors. v. V. Hombegowda & Anr.
The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order allowing a Regular Second Appeal without framing substantial questions of law and hearing all parties, emphasizing strict compliance with Section 100 CPC procedural requirements.