Supreme Court of India

13,887 judgments

Year:
Showing 2020 — 1117 judgments found

SHRI PARESHBHAI AMRUTLAL PATEL v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT

28 Feb 2020 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court directed transfer of FIR proceedings to the court where an earlier cheque bounce complaint is pending for joint hearing, refusing to quash the FIR.

criminal other Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC joint trial

District Bar Association, Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya & Ors.

28 Feb 2020 · Arun Mishra; M. R. Shah · 2020 INSC 237

The Supreme Court held that advocates have no right to strike or boycott courts as it obstructs justice, amounts to contempt, and violates fundamental rights, upholding the High Court’s directions restraining such strikes.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant lawyers strike boycott of courts freedom of speech and expression Article 19(1)(a)

District Bar Association, Dehradun v. Ishwar Shandilya & Ors.

28 Feb 2020 · Arun Mishra; M. R. Shah

The Supreme Court held that advocates have no right to strike or boycott courts as it obstructs justice and upheld the High Court’s directions restraining such strikes, emphasizing the duty of Bar Councils to discipline errant advocates.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Significant lawyers strike boycott of courts freedom of speech and expression Article 19(1)(a)

Commissioner, Directorate of Logistics v. M/s. Almighty Techserv

28 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court granted interim relief allowing the government to proceed with the tender awarded to M/s. ASVA Power Systems India Pvt. Ltd. for urgent procurement, subject to withholding disputed amounts pending final hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant interim relief government procurement tender evaluation public interest

Bagawe v. State of Maharashtra

27 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's withdrawal of pay scale benefits granted under a 2004 resolution, clarified entitlement under the 1995 resolution, and limited recovery of excess payments to amounts received after the final tribunal order in 2014.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Government Resolution Pay scale Promotion Junior Clerk

Bagawe v. State of Maharashtra

27 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court upheld the State Government's withdrawal of pay scale benefits granted to Junior Clerks, allowing recovery of excess payments only from the date of final adjudication, balancing executive authority and employee rights.

administrative appeal_partly_allowed Significant Government Resolution pay scale Deputy Accountant Junior Clerk

Arun Kumar Gupta v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.

27 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the compulsory retirement of two judicial officers, affirming that such orders are non-punitive, require bona fide public interest, consider entire service records including adverse entries, and are subject to limited judicial review.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant compulsory retirement judicial officers public interest washed off theory

Tulsi Narayan Garg v. M.P. Road Development Authority

26 Feb 2020 · N.V. Ramana; Indira Banerjee; Ajay Rastogi

The Supreme Court held that recovery of liquidated damages as arrears of land revenue is impermissible pending arbitration under the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983, and quashed the High Court's order permitting such recovery.

civil appeal_allowed Significant liquidated damages arbitral tribunal Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 recovery proceedings

a241b015cd31691baa5ede53643fb34eb9276599cad4b42abf1ab20a0a96fe02

26 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that mortgage transactions by a corporate debtor securing debts of its holding company are not preferential transactions under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code when made in the ordinary course of business.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant preferential transactions Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 Section 43 ordinary course of business

c0397a473822e5afb678a3e856f53c8ae4ed135067b6c3595949afa274c9d787

26 Feb 2020 · A. M. Khanwilkar; Dinesh Maheshwari

The Supreme Court held that mortgage transactions by a corporate debtor securing loans of its holding company are not preferential under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code when made in the ordinary course of business, allowing the lenders to retain their security interests.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant preferential transactions Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Section 43 ordinary course of business

The State of Punjab v. Jasbir Singh

26 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Mohan M. Shantanagoudar

The Supreme Court held that a preliminary inquiry and hearing before filing a complaint under Section 195 CrPC are discretionary, not mandatory, and directed a larger Bench to decide the conflicting precedents on this issue.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC Section 340 CrPC preliminary inquiry opportunity of hearing

Sitabai Shantaram Talawnekar v. Custodian of Evacuee Property

25 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; R. Subhash Reddy

The Supreme Court held that tenancy rights over evacuee property under the Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act apply only to tenancies created by the Custodian, and set aside tenancy declaration granted without such basis.

civil appeal_allowed Significant evacuee property tenancy rights Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act Custodian of Evacuee Property

ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES LTD. v. SURESH PRODUCTIONS

25 Feb 2020 · Ashok Bhushan; Navin Sinha

The Supreme Court held that the limitation period for a suit claiming infringement of satellite broadcasting rights begins only when the plaintiff's rights are threatened or infringed after expiry of prior assignments, dismissing the appeal and affirming the suit's validity.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant cause of action limitation assignment deed satellite broadcasting rights

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Mukesh Poonamchand Shah

25 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that an employer can initiate disciplinary action based on a criminal conviction despite suspension of sentence pending appeal, and such action does not violate double jeopardy protections.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings criminal conviction Regulation 39(4) double jeopardy

Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Mukesh Poonamchand Shah

25 Feb 2020 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Hemant Gupta

The Supreme Court held that an employer can proceed with disciplinary removal of an employee based on criminal conviction despite a pending appeal and prior disciplinary penalties, as double jeopardy does not apply to service proceedings.

labor appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings criminal conviction double jeopardy Regulation 39 LIC Staff Regulations

Union of India v. Federation of Self-Financed Ayurvedic Colleges

20 Feb 2020 · L. Nageswara Rao; Deepak Gupta

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the 2018 Regulations mandating NEET for AYUSH admissions, affirming the Central Council's power to prescribe minimum educational standards including entrance examinations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant NEET AYUSH admissions Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 minimum standards of education

Kerala State Electricity Board v. Principal Sir Syed Institute for Technical Studies

20 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose · 2020 INSC 218

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala Electricity Commission's classification of Self-Financing Educational Institutions under a higher commercial tariff category, ruling that such differentiation is justified under Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and does not violate principles of natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 62(3) tariff fixation Self-Financing Educational Institutions

Kerala State Electricity Board v. Principal Sir Syed Institute for Technical Studies

20 Feb 2020 · Deepak Gupta; Aniruddha Bose

The Supreme Court upheld the Kerala Electricity Commission's tariff notification differentiating Self-Financing Educational Institutions from Government aided institutions under Section 62(3) of the Electricity Act, 2003, holding such differentiation legally valid and not violative of natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Electricity Act 2003 Section 62(3) tariff fixation Self-Financing Educational Institutions

Md. Younus Ali Tarafdar v. The State of West Bengal

20 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to incomplete and unreliable circumstantial evidence failing to conclusively prove his guilt for murder and concealment of the body.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence identification of dead body confessional statement Section 302 IPC

Md. Younus Ali Tarafdar v. The State of West Bengal

20 Feb 2020 · L. NAGESWARA RAO; DEEPAK GUPTA

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to incomplete and unreliable circumstantial evidence failing to exclude reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence murder identification of dead body confessional statement