Delhi High Court

38,124 judgments

Year:

Vaijinath v. Union of India

25 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:568-DB

The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of disciplinary penalties to ensure parity among similarly placed CISF personnel, emphasizing equal treatment in punishment for identical misconduct.

administrative other Significant parity in punishment disciplinary proceedings Central Industrial Security Force removal from service

Maninder Singh & Anr. v. Nirmal Kaur

25 Jan 2024 · HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEE... · 2024:DHC:635-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the refusal to vacate an ex-parte interim order maintaining status quo over disputed property, holding that interlocutory discretion was rightly exercised and substantive issues require trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant oral family settlement interim injunction Order 39 Rule 4 CPC status quo

Sandeep @ Chiku v. State (NCT of Delhi)

25 Jan 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:528
Cites 2 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court granted bail to accused in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to non-compliance with mandatory sampling procedures prescribed under Standing Orders, creating reasonable doubt under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act Section 52A NDPS Act sampling procedure

Kamdhenu Dreamz & Anr. v. M/S Dina Iron and Steel Limited

25 Jan 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:567-DB

The Delhi High Court held that for return of plaint under Order VII Rule 10 CPC on territorial jurisdiction grounds, only the plaint's averments are to be considered, and set aside the order returning the plaint for lack of jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 10 CPC territorial jurisdiction return of plaint Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC

Suresh Kumar Sharma & Anr v. Union of India Thr GM

25 Jan 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:549
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal’s rejection of compensation, holding that the deceased was not a bona fide passenger and his death did not arise from an untoward incident under the Railways Act.

administrative appeal_dismissed Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 bona fide passenger untoward incident

Prakash Chand Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:755-DB

The Delhi High Court held that judicial review under Article 226 in BSF disciplinary proceedings is limited and refused to suspend the petitioner's sentence pending disposal of his Post Confirmation Petition.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Border Security Force Act disciplinary proceedings judicial review Article 226

Uzdaroji Akcine Bendrove (UAB) Baltijos Mineraliniu Vandenu Kompanija v. Mr. Sahil Tandon Trading as A and Z Exports International & Anr.

25 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:803

The Delhi High Court cancelled a trademark registration obtained in bad faith by an unauthorized agent, affirming the Petitioner's prior user rights over the 'TICHE' mark under the Trademarks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant trademark registration prior user rights bad faith Trademarks Act 1999

Anil Kumar Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi

25 Jan 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:560

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking regular bail of a director accused of cheating homebuyers by selling flats in an unregistered real estate project, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences and prima facie case against him.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail application real estate fraud Amrapali Silicon City Pvt. Ltd. Section 420 IPC

Ahuja Radios v. M/S. Rohini Electronics & Ors.

25 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:951

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Ahuja Radios against defendants selling counterfeit products bearing its registered trademarks, affirming trademark infringement and passing off.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Permanent injunction Counterfeit goods

M A Alagappan v. PVR Limited

25 Jan 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:559

The Delhi High Court quashed proceedings against a Non-Executive Director in a cheque dishonor case for lack of specific allegations of responsibility, holding that mere directorship without control over company affairs does not attract criminal liability.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Non-Executive Director Negotiable Instruments Act Dishonored cheque Section 482 CrPC

Blue Star Limited v. Commissioner of Delhi Value Added Tax & Anr.

25 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:605-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to pass a speaking order on interest entitlement under Section 42 of the Delhi VAT Act and to pay the refund amount within two weeks, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

tax petition_dismissed Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Section 42 refund interest on refund

MS K S JAIN BUILDERS v. INDIAN RAILWAY WELFARE ORGANIZATION

25 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Narula · 2024:DHC:2943
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging partial allowance of loss of profits in an arbitral award, holding no patent illegality or public policy violation and upholding the award in entirety.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitral award Section 34 Arbitration Act Patent illegality Loss of profits

Romita Sukhija v. Gurcharan Singh Sachar

25 Jan 2024 · C. Hari Shankar

The Delhi High Court disposed of the property dispute appeal and contempt petition by recording a lawful settlement deed executed voluntarily by the parties.

civil appeal_allowed settlement deed withdrawal of appeal withdrawal of contempt petition property dispute

M/S MAA JHANDEWALI TRADERS v. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICE TAX NORTH DELHI

25 Jan 2024 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:631-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the GST registration cancellation due to procedural deficiencies and directed fresh adjudication after affording the petitioner an opportunity to respond and be heard.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation show cause notice procedural fairness natural justice

Usha Devi & Ors. v. Pradeep Kumar & Ors.

25 Jan 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2014 SCC OnLine Del 1268
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for compensation under the Employees Compensation Act due to lack of proof of employment and valid driving license, holding no liability on the respondents.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 employer-employee relationship driving license TSR vehicle

Sangita Morya v. State

25 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:591-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a habeas corpus petition regarding a missing minor with directions for continued police efforts and monthly status reports, finding all possible steps had been taken but the minor remained untraced.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Missing Minor Section 363 IPC Abduction

Coreip Technology Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jan 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:957

The Delhi High Court upheld the debarment of CoreIP Technology for falsely declaring local content below prescribed thresholds in products hosted on the GeM portal, emphasizing judicial restraint in procurement disputes.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant General Financial Rules local content Government Electronic Marketplace debarment

Prashant v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Jan 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:601

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that a shooter participating only in 10M air pistol events is not eligible to import 0.22 or 0.32 bore firearms without qualifying in the requisite 25M pistol events under the Arms Act and import policy.

administrative petition_dismissed Arms Act, 1959 import of firearms renowned shooter 10M air pistol

Indraprastha Power Generation Company Limited v. Raghubir Singh

25 Jan 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · AIR 2022 SCC 4609
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that the plaintiff was senior and wrongly superseded, holding the suit timely under continuing wrong doctrine and not barred by res judicata.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant seniority promotion limitation continuing wrong

CPL Chetan Gautam v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:571-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the posting of a serviceman with chronic low backache, holding that expert medical opinion did not warrant setting aside the transfer order.

administrative petition_dismissed posting order medical fitness chronic low backache neurosurgeon