Delhi High Court

38,124 judgments

Year:

Manish Rachhoy v. Kamal Kant Rachhoya

31 Jan 2024 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH A... · 2024:DHC:731-DB

The Delhi High Court reduced the exorbitant fee fixed for a Local Commissioner recording evidence abroad from Rs. 7.5 lakhs to Rs. 2 lakhs, emphasizing reasonableness and prevailing norms.

civil appeal_allowed Local Commissioner Order XXVI Rule 2 CPC fees exorbitant fee

Uttam Chand Bhatia v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:1164

The Delhi High Court upheld a Labour Court award granting lump sum compensation instead of reinstatement for illegal termination after a long delay, dismissing the writ petition challenging the award.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 11-A reinstatement lump sum compensation

M/S MACNEILL ENGINEERING LTD v. SMT. SHARMILA GOEL

31 Jan 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:752-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the delayed appeal in a commercial lease rent arrears suit, rejecting condonation of delay and upholding the trial court’s decree after finding no denial of opportunity to lead evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act commercial lease dispute rent arrears

M/S EVERSHINE ENTERPRISES v. M/S PK MOTORS

31 Jan 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:865-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a summary suit on territorial jurisdiction grounds, restored the suit, and granted conditional leave to defend, emphasizing that jurisdictional issues and defence plausibility require trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction exclusive jurisdiction clause summary suit leave to defend

Suresh Shankar Ranade v. Union of India and Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:689-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking extension of retirement age and pension benefits beyond 55 years for a BSF officer, upholding the Supreme Court’s ruling that the retirement age for Commandant (Selection Grade) is 55 years.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant retirement age superannuation Commandant Selection Grade Border Security Force Rules

Surinder Singh v. Union of India and Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · V. Kameswar Rao; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:887-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a war-injured BSF officer in Low Medical Category is entitled to exemption from Mandatory Field Service for promotion and directed promotion with effect from the date juniors were promoted.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Mandatory Field Service Low Medical Category War injury Promotion

D BALA MURUGAN v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

31 Jan 2024 · SURESH KUMAR KAIT; MANOJ JAIN · 2024:DHC:799-DB

The Court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition as the alleged detainee, being a major, was not under unlawful confinement and was free to decide her own affairs.

criminal petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus unlawful detention majority personal liberty

Nishesh Ranjan & Anr. v. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd & Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2024:DHC:793

The Delhi High Court held that despite conflicting arbitration and jurisdiction clauses in multiple agreements, an arbitrator can be appointed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act to resolve disputes, recognizing incorporation of arbitration clauses by reference.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) arbitration clause jurisdiction clause

Sanjeev Kumar v. Sub Divisional Magistrate Dwarka and Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:849

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for execution of a recovery certificate, holding that the executing authority had taken appropriate steps and no unjustified delay or mala fide was shown.

labor petition_dismissed writ of mandamus industrial award recovery certificate execution proceedings

Rama Kant v. Sub Divisional Magistrate Dwarka and Anr.

31 Jan 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:854

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking mandamus for execution of a recovery certificate arising from an industrial award, holding that no unjustified delay or failure of statutory duty by the executing authority was shown.

labor petition_dismissed writ of mandamus industrial award recovery certificate execution proceedings

Naman Gupta v. Commissioner of Customs Airport and General

30 Jan 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja · 2024:DHC:658-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court allowed writ petition quashing revocation of Custom Broker license due to denial of cross-examination and held that brokers are entitled to rely on customs-verified exporter credentials.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Custom Broker Licensing Regulation, 2018 right to cross-examination natural justice Customs Act, 1962

V v. M

30 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:1430-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an adulterous relationship alone does not disqualify a parent from child custody and upheld permanent custody with the mother subject to a modified shared parenting plan prioritizing the children's welfare.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody adultery shared parenting welfare of child

Babban Giri v. State of NCT of Delhi

30 Jan 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:1133

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to accused persons, holding that no cogent supervening circumstances justified revoking bail.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant cancellation of bail supervening circumstances abuse of bail threats to complainant

Amit Kumar & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

30 Jan 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:623

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking FIR registration and CBI investigation into deaths of two IIT students alleging caste-based discrimination, holding that detailed enquiries negated such claims and extraordinary relief was unwarranted.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant mandamus FIR registration SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 caste-based discrimination

M/S PADMASHREE INC v. M/S UTTAM ENTERPRISES

30 Jan 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:730

The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff was entitled to recover losses and interest due to the defendant's breach of a fixed price procurement agreement for coriander, rejecting the defendant's belated defense.

civil appeal_allowed Significant contract breach fixed price agreement procurement of goods loss recovery

Central Bureau of Investigation v. State

30 Jan 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:616

The Delhi High Court allowed the CBI's writ petition directing the Trial Court to supply certified copies of documents for investigation in a disproportionate assets case, emphasizing the mandatory procedural safeguards under the CBI Manual and the importance of obtaining documents directly from Court records.

criminal appeal_allowed CBI disproportionate assets videography CBI Crime Manual

Vishal Srivastava and Others v. State of NCT of Delhi and Others

30 Jan 2024 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2024:DHC:622

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 419, 354(A), 504, 509, and 34 IPC on the basis of an amicable settlement between parties, applying the principles laid down in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement inherent jurisdiction

Nisha Kapoor v. Deepak Saini

30 Jan 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:781-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld a divorce decree granted on the ground of mental cruelty where the wife developed a relationship with another man and deprived the husband of conjugal rights, rejecting her appeal and unsubstantiated allegations.

family appeal_dismissed Significant cruelty divorce Hindu Marriage Act 1955 mental cruelty

Bhawna Grover v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

30 Jan 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:659

The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of two accused by the trial court but set aside the dropping of key prosecution witnesses, directing their restoration and examination to ensure a fair trial.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. discharge of accused Section 294 Cr.P.C. prosecution witnesses

Central Public Information Officer, Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sanjeev Chaturvedi

30 Jan 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:776
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the CBI is not exempt from the RTI Act for information related to corruption allegations and must disclose such information unless exempted under other provisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 24 RTI Act Central Bureau of Investigation Second Schedule exemption